The effect of Octavius's speech on the narrator

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Marcus the narrator describes the stunned silence that follows Octavius's closing speech, before Caecilius responds.

When Octavius had finished speaking, we sat stunned for some time, our faces fixed in silence. As for me, I was overcome by the sheer force of admiration. He had adorned what is easier to feel than to say with arguments, examples, and the authority of texts. He had turned back the malicious with the very weapons of the philosophers with which they arm themselves. And he had shown that truth is not only easy but also favorable.

Latin

Cum Octauius perorasset, aliquamdiu nos ad silentium stupefacti intentos uultus tenebamus, et quod ad me est, magnitudine admirationis euanui, quod ea, quae facilius est sentire quam dicere, et argumentis et exemplis et lectionum auctoritatibus adornasset, et quod maleuolos isdem illis quibus armantur, philosophorum telis retudisset, ostendisset etiam ueritatem non tantummodo facilem sed et fauorabilem.

About this text

A Latin dialogue set at Ostia: the pagan Caecilius and the Christian Octavius debate the old gods and the Christian faith.

Minucius Felix (fl. c. 200) was a Roman lawyer and Christian apologist who wrote in Latin. His only known work is the dialogue Octavius, composed in the Roman Empire as a defense of Christianity against pagan philosophy and skepticism. He wrote it to persuade educated non-Christians by presenting a reasoned debate between a pagan and a Christian.

The dialogue is framed as the author's recollection of a visit to Ostia with his friends Octavius and Caecilius. When Caecilius, a pagan, kisses a statue of Serapis, Octavius reproaches him, and Caecilius proposes a formal debate about pagan religion and Christianity, with the author as judge. The internal audience is Marcus, the narrator.

Caecilius first argues that human knowledge is uncertain, that Rome owes its greatness to traditional worship of the gods, and that Christians are a depraved secret society deserving punishment. Octavius replies that the order of the universe proves one creator God, that the pagan gods were merely deified humans and their myths are immoral, and that demons inspire pagan oracles and slanders against Christians. He defends Christian morals, worship, and hope of resurrection, and argues that Christian endurance under suffering shows God's power. Caecilius concedes defeat, acknowledges providence and the Christian God, and the friends depart joyfully. A reader should know that 'superstition' means false or excessive religious practice, 'religion' means proper worship, 'demons' are impure spirits that deceive humans, 'providence' is God's ordering and care of the universe, 'fate' is blind chance or destiny, 'resurrection' is the Christian hope of bodily restoration after death, 'idol' is an image of a pagan god, 'deity' is divine power, 'wisdom' is true wisdom available to all through reason, 'truth' is the truth about God and religion, 'incest' is alleged sexual immorality, 'sacrilege' is violation of what is sacred, 'spirit' is used of God's nature and of impure spirits, 'mind' is reason identified with God's nature, and 'reason' is rational order in the universe and human understanding of God.

New English from the Latin base text; no published English used as wording.

Printed text used

Translated from CSEL 2 (1867) (Latin)

This work has passed this project's source check. This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.