Apollinarius and Nestorius share one impiety
Cyril opens the fragment by stating his judgment on the errors of Apollinarius and Nestorius.
I consider the opinion of Apollinarius and the blasphemy of Nestorius to be one and the same impiety. I believe it is the same error to ascribe division or a duality to the Only-Begotten Son of God according to the incarnation, and not to confess that his flesh, which has a soul and is all-holy, is human except for sin alone. It is the same error to say either that his flesh had its existence from heaven, or that it came into being through a change of the Word. To those who have fallen into any such error, I say, quoting Scripture, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures.”
Greek
col1.1 την Ἀπολιναριου δοξ̣[α]ν κ̣αι την Νεστορ̣[ιο]υ̣ δυσ[φη]μι̣[αν] ἡγ̣ου̣μ[αι ········]· ·[··········]··του ·[ σ]αρκω[······] ··[··]μενω(ν) [····]κ̣ακοπιστιαν [····]ε̣πομαι· ἰσης και [της αὐ]της ἀσεβειας εἰ[ν]αι π̣ι̣στευων, το με[ρ]ι̣σμον ἠ δυαδα τῳ Μονογενει Ὑ(ι)ῳ του Θ(εο)υ κατα την οἰκονομια(ν) π̣ρ̣οσαπτειν, και το την ἐμψυχον αὐτου και παναγιαν σαρκα μ̣η ἀνθρωπινην [ὁ]μ̣ολο̣γειν, π̣λην [ἁμαρ]τ̣ιας μονον χω[ρις, ἀ]λ̣λ̣' ἠ ἐξ οὐ(ρα)νου τη(ν) [ὑπαρ]ξιν ἐσχηκεναι, [ἠ κατ]α τροπην του [Λογου] γεγενη[σθ]α̣ι̣ [····]φαντασμ[··]ν [·····]·τοις ουν̣[··]σ̣·· [····]·μενων η̣[··] [··· οἱ]ανδηποτουν [·····]ν ἐμπεπτω[κ····]ι̣ν εἰπων, Πλα[νωντ]α̣ι μη εἰδοτες [τ]ας̣ [γρα]φα̣[ς], και μητ̣ε