Possessions are indifferent; the passions are what must be renounced
Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.
Clement is explaining that the command to sell one's possessions refers to the passions of the soul, not to external goods, which are indifferent in themselves.
I myself would say this as well.Since some things are within the soul and others are outside it, if the soul uses them well, these too appear good, but if badly, they appear evil.Does the one who commands us to alienate our possessions reject these first—the things whose removal still leaves the passions in place—or rather those things whose removal makes even possessions useful?For the person who has thrown away his worldly wealth can still be rich in passions even when the material is absent.His disposition does its own work: it chokes and presses his reasoning and burns with the desires that have grown up with him.So it has done him no good to become poor in money while he is rich in passions.He has not thrown away what should be thrown away, but only indifferent things.He has cut himself off from what could serve him, and by his lack of outward things he has kindled the innate fuel of evil.One must therefore renounce the possessions that cause harm, not those that can also help if someone understands their right use.Things managed with wisdom, self-control, and reverence do good, but the things that cause loss must be thrust away.Outward things do not harm.
So then the Lord also introduces the need for outward things.