On Repentance · §6 · Tertullian

Presumption on baptism must not delay true repentance

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Tertullian is addressing catechumens who have begun to hear Christian teaching but postpone real repentance, presuming on the forgiveness baptism will bring.

So whatever our modest ability has tried to suggest about taking up repentance once and holding to it forever concerns all who are devoted to the Lord, since all are seeking salvation by winning God's favor. But it presses especially on these newcomers, who are just now beginning to let their ears be nourished by God's words. Like newborn animals still unsteady, with eyes not yet fully formed, they crawl about uncertainly. They say they renounce their former ways and they take up repentance, but they neglect to lock it in. The very goal they desire distracts them, tempting them to want something from the past—like fruit that is beginning to grow sour or bitter with age, yet still flatters them with some part of its sweetness.

Moreover, every fault of hesitation and evasion regarding repentance is brought in by presumption about baptism. Certain of undoubted forgiveness for their sins, they steal the time in between and make for themselves a holiday from sinning rather than a training in not sinning. How absurd it is not to fulfill repentance while waiting for forgiveness of sins! That is holding out your hand for the merchandise without paying the price. For the Lord has appointed forgiveness to be sold at this price; he offers freedom from punishment to be redeemed by this payment of repentance. If sellers first examine the coin with which they are bargaining to see whether it is scratched or filed or counterfeit, do we believe the Lord does not first test repentance before granting us so great a reward—eternal life?

But let us postpone the truth of repentance for a little while. Then, I suppose, it will be clear that we are reformed when we are absolved. Not at all. Rather, when forgiveness is still pending and punishment is in view, when we do not yet deserve to be set free so that we may deserve it, when God threatens—not when he forgives. What slave, after being changed by freedom, charges himself with his thefts and flights? What soldier, after being discharged from his camp, troubles himself over the marks branded on his body? A sinner ought to weep before forgiveness, because the time of repentance is the same as the time of danger and fear of God.

I do not refuse the divine benefit—the abolition of sins—to those about to enter the water; it is wholly saving. But one must labor to arrive there. Who will grant you, a man of such unfaithful repentance, a single sprinkling of any water? It is easy to approach by theft and lead the one in charge of this matter astray with your assertions, but God watches over his treasure and does not allow the unworthy to creep in. What does he say after all? "Nothing is hidden that will not be revealed" (Matthew 10:26). However much darkness you pile over your deeds, God is light.

But some think that God is obliged to provide what he promised even to the unworthy, and they make his generosity into slavery. If he grants us the symbol of death by necessity, then he does it unwillingly. Who permits what he gave unwillingly to remain? Do not many fall away afterward? Is not that gift taken away from many? These are the ones who creep in, who attack the faith of repentance and build a house about to collapse on sand.

Let no one flatter himself because he is counted among the catechumens under instruction, as if even now it were permitted to him to sin. As soon as you know the Lord, fear him; as soon as you have seen him, revere him. What good is it to have known him if you lie on the same things you did before, when you were ignorant? What separates you from a perfect servant of God? Is there one Christ for the baptized and another for catechumens? Is there one hope or reward, another fear of judgment, another necessity of repentance? That washing is the sealing of faith, and this faith begins and is commended by the faith of repentance. We are not washed so that we may stop sinning, but because we have stopped, since we have already been washed in heart. For this is the first baptism of the catechumen: complete fear of God. From then on, as long as you have felt the Lord, faith is sound and conscience has once embraced repentance.

But if we stop sinning from the waters, we put on innocence by necessity, not by choice. Who excels in goodness? The one to whom evil is not permitted, or the one to whom evil is displeasing? The one who is commanded, or the one who delights to be free from crime? So let us not turn our hands from theft unless the hardness of locks resists, nor restrain our eyes from lustful desires unless dragged away by guardians of bodies—if no one devoted to the Lord stops sinning unless bound by baptism. But if anyone thinks this way, I do not know whether the baptized person is more grieved that he has stopped sinning than glad that he has escaped.

Therefore catechumens ought to desire baptism, not presume upon it. The one who desires honors it; the one who presumes is arrogant. In the former modesty appears, in the latter insolence. The former labors, the latter neglects. The former longs to deserve it, the latter promises it to himself as a debt. The former receives, the latter seizes. Whom would you judge more worthy except the more reformed? Whom more reformed except the more fearful, and therefore the one who has performed true repentance? For he feared to sin any longer, lest he not deserve to receive. But the presumptuous one, since he promised it to himself, was of course secure and could not fear. Thus he did not fulfill repentance, because he lacked the instrument of repentance—that is, fear of God. Presumption is a portion of shamelessness: it inflates the petitioner and despises the giver. So it sometimes deceives. For it promises before it is owed, and by this the one who is about to grant is always offended.

Latin

Quicquid ergo mediocritas nostra ad paenitentiam semel capessendam et perpetuo continendam suggerere conata est, omnes quidem deditos domino spectat, ut omnes salutis in promerendo deo petitores, sed praecipue novitiolis istis imminet, qui cum maxime incipiunt divinis sermonibus aures rigare, quique catuli infantiae adhuc recentis nec perfectis luminibus incerta reptant, et dicunt quidem pristinis renuntiare et paenitentiam assumunt, sed includere eam neglegunt. Interpellat enim illos ad desiderandum ex pristinis aliquid ipse finis desiderandi, velut poma, cum iam in acorem vel amaritudinem senescere incipiunt, ex parte aliqua tamen adhuc ipsi gratiae suae adulantur. Omne praeterea cunctationis et tergiversationis erga paenitentiam vitium praesumptio intinctionis importat. Certi enim indubitatae veniae delictorum medium tempus interim furantur et commeatum sibi faciunt delinquendi quam eruditionem non delinquendi. Quam porro ineptum, quam paenitentiam non adimplere, ei veniam delictorum sustinere? Hoc est pretium non exhibere, ad mercem manum emittere. Hoc enim pretio dominus veniam addicere instituit; hac paenitentiae compensatione redimendam proponit impunitatem. Si ergo qui venditant prius numum quo paciscuntur examinant, ne scalptus neve rasus, ne adulter, etiam dominum credimus paenitentiae probationem prius inire, tantam nobis mercedem perennis scilicet vitae concessurum. Sed differamus tantisper paenitentiae veritatem. Tunc, opinor, emendatos liquebit, cum absolvimur. Nullo pacto. Sed cum pendente venia poena prospicitur, cum adhuc liberari non meretur, ut possimus mereri, cum deus comminatur, non cum ignoscit. Quis enim servus, posteaquam libertate mutatus est, furta sua et fugas sibi imputat? Quis miles, postquam castris suis emissus, pro notis suis satagit? Peccator ante veniam deflere se debet, quia tempus paenitentiae idem quod periculi et timoris. Neque ego renuo divinum beneficium, id est abolitionem delictorum, inituris aquam omnimodo salvum esse: sed ut eo pervenire contingat elaborandum est. Quis enim tibi tam infidae paenitentiae viro asperginem unam cuiuslibet aquae commodabit? Furto quidem aggredi et praepositum huius rei asseverationibus tuis circumduci facile est: sed deus thesauro suo providet, nec sinit obrepere indignos. Quid denique ait? Nihil occultum, quod non revelabitur. Quantascunque tenebras factis tuis superstruxeris, deus lumen est. Quidam autem sic opinantur, quasi deus necesse lrabeat praestare etiam indignis quod spopondit, et liberalitatem eius faciunt servitutem. Quodsi necessitate nobis symbolum mortis indulget, ergo invitus facit. Quis autem permittit permansurum id quod tribuerit invitus? Non enim multi postea excidunt? non a multis donum illud aufertur? Hi sunt scilicet, qui obrepunt, qui paenitentiae fidem aggressi super arenas domum ruituram collocant. Nemo ergo sibi aduletur quia inter auditorum tirocinia deputatur, quasi eo etiam nunc sibi delinquere liceal. Dominum simul cognoveris, timeas, simul inspexeris, reverearis. Ceterum quid te cognovisse interest, cum iisdem incubas quibus retro ignarus? Quid autem te a perfecto servo dei separat? An alius est intinctis Christus, alius audientibus? Num spes alia vel merces, alia formido iudicii, alia necessitas paenitentiae? Lavacrum illud obsignatio est fidei, quae fides a paenitentiae fide incipitur et commendatur. Non ideo abluimur, ut delinquere desinamus, sed quia desiimus, quoniam iam corde loti sumus. Haec enim prima audientis intinctio est, metus integer. Exinde, quoad dominum senseris, fides sana, conscientia semel paenitentiam amplexata. Ceterum si ab aquis peccare desistimus, necessitate, non sponte, innocentiam induimus. Quis ergo in bonitate praecellens? cui non licet, aut cui displicet malo esse? qui iubetur, an qui delectatur a crimine vacare? Ergo nec a furto manus avertamus, nisi claustrorum duritia repugnet, nec oculos a stupri concupiscentiis refrenemus, nisi a custodibus corporum abstracti, si nemo domino deditus delinquere desinet nisi intinctione alligatus. Quod si qui ita senserit, nescio an intinctus magis contristetur, quod peccare desierit, quam laetetur, quod evaserit. Itaque audientes optare intinctionem, non praesumere oportet. Qui enim optat, honorat: qui praesumit, superbit. In illo verecundia, in isto petulantia apparet. Ille satagit, hic neglegit. Ille mereri cupit, at hic ut debitum sibi repromittit. Ille sumit, hic invadit. Quem censeas digniorem nisi emendatiorem? quem emendatiorem, nisi timidiorem, et idcirco vera paenitentia functum? Timuit enim adhuc delinquere, ne non mereretur accipere. At ille praesumptor, cum sibi repromitteret, securus scilicet, timere non potuit: sic nec paenitentiam implevit, quia instrumento paenitentiae, id est metu, caruit. Praesumptio inverecundiae portio est: inflat petitorem, despicit datorem. Itaque decipit nonnunquam. Ante enim quam debeatur repromittit, quo semper is qui est praestaturus offenditur.