Divine Sovereignty and the Law
For he was not sufficient to die for us, but he also acts as an ambassador for the Father on our behalf. And it is clear that he encounters these things just as he used to encounter humans according to the flesh; for he was saying of the Father, 'I want that where I am, they also may be' (cf. John 14:3); before this, the Savior encounters them. Nor does he encounter them as if teaching while ignoring the Father, nor as if not willing; for what the Father wills, the Son also wills. What then is the purpose of the ambassadorship and the encounter? The word cuts ahead of the impious doctrine of Sabellius, teaching how, even if the essence is one of the Trinity, it is not one hypostasis; for through the encounter, the one asking and the other being asked are shown. It is not strange that the Son should ask and the Father should grant, so that a fitting order may be preserved regarding both persons. Or was it not incongruous, knowing the will of the Father, for the Son of the Father to reach the gift and to give the grace by seizing it? In the same way, indeed all things were created through the Son, but by the will of the Father, so that the whole following and fitting order may be preserved regarding both persons. Therefore the word teaches us the unmixed order concerning the Father and the Son; and if one even considers Christ in the flesh as asking, the word will appear much more clearly to you.
Having clearly shown how God feels toward us and the love of his Son (cf. Romans 8:37), he teaches followingly, whom then it is necessary for the grateful to be toward the benefactor, so that even those who are most fearful may not be able to separate us from Christ. Some think there is a solution to this, especially Asterius the Cappadocian, thinking thus: 'You who argue against me, how do you argue? Not from the authority according to the will? Do you not respond to God, wanting to show that God does not compel and make men righteous? For authority remains with humans' (cf. Romans 9:20-21). But such a thought has no logic, for it leads to this: 'Does the creature say to the Creator: Why did you make me thus?' But this does not show that we are in authority, but rather the opposite. What then is the meaning? This is said from 'possession,' not a solution is set. And what is that from 'possession'? But most of all, who are you? For let us hold that we do not even have will, nor to be self-determining.
Did God not have authority as He wished? But a potter indeed fashions some for honor and others for dishonor, yet God does not have the authority that the potter has, so as to honor whom He wants and to punish whom He wills? Having said this out of surplus, he subsequently makes the solution.
He speaks of a demonstration of wrath (Rom 9:22), which He forgives to men through long-suffering, allowing them to do what they want; but he speaks of men as vessels of wrath prepared for destruction (Rom 9:22), who are under the limit of death. Some others indeed, regarding the 'but if God, desiring to show His wrath and the following,' answered, 'what do you know?'; they gave an answer that is thought to be deficient from the outside. And 'in much long-suffering' he brought forth the wrath instead of 'with much long-suffering.'
Christ is not as a part of the law, but as a beginning of another life (Rom 10:4). Therefore it is said that the end of the law, as having become the end of the law, is this: that He stopped it (Rom 10:4). So there are two ends of the law, because He used it and because He stopped it. And to everyone who believes, instead of not only to the Jew but also to the Greek, not because the end of the law is already for the Jew alone.
Having mentioned the cultivated and the wild (Rom 11:24), he showed that there is one nature for all, just as with the olive tree; not one choice, as with the wild and the cultivated; the wild one, having been uprooted, is ugly and useless to the master, but the cultivated one is fruit-bearing. And he calls the grafting 'being grafted in the faith of Abraham,' whom he names the root; and he says that the grafting provides life.
However, it is spoken deficiently, which is why it is also disconnected (Rom 11:28-29). Thus it is, so that from the comparison toward you, the Jews are convicted to be enemies of God (Rom 11:28-29), because you, the Gentiles, believed, but those who owed to believe above all things hardened their heart; and according to this very reason they are enemies of God, but beloved because of the fathers, for whose sake He will show philanthropy toward their descendants, and He will consider those believing and having shown a citizenship to be beloved, able to save.
The present state of the world is turned toward luxuries and pleasures (Rom 12:2), which anyone may refuse the pattern of, and will change himself into a transformed self and a foreign citizenship. As having become a new man from one to another.
Greek
οὐκ ἠρκέσθη γὰρ τῷ ἀποθανεῖν ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν, ἀλλὰ καὶ πρεσβεύει τὸν πατέρα ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν. καὶ δῆλον ὅτι ταῦτα ἐντυγχάνει ἅπερ καὶ ἡνίκα συνῆν ἀνθρώποις κατὰ σάρκα· ᾔτει γὰρ τὸν πατέρα λέγων, θέλω ἵνα ὅπου ἐγώ εἰμι καὶ αὐτοὶ ὦσιν· πρὶν τούτου ἐντυγχάνει ὁ σωτήρ. οὔτε δὲ ὡς ἀγνοοῦντα τὸν πατέρα τὰ καθ' ἡμᾶς διδάσκει ἐντυγχάνων, οὔτε ὡς μὴ βουλόμενον· ἃ γὰρ βούλεται ὁ πατὴρ βούλεται καὶ ὁ υἱός. τί οὖν βούλεται ἡ πρεσβεία καὶ ἡ ἐντυχία; τὴν μέλλουσαν ἀσέβειαν Σαβελλίου προεκκόπτει ὁ λόγος, διδάσκων ὡς, εἰ καὶ μία ἐστὶ τῆς τριάδος ἡ οὐσία, ἀλλ' οὐχὶ μία ὑπόστασις· διὰ γὰρ τῆς ἐντεύξεως ἕτερος ὁ αἰτῶν καὶ ἕτερος ὁ αἰτούμενος δείκνυται· οὐκ ἄτοπον γὰρ τὸν μὲν υἱὸν αἰτεῖν, τὸν δὲ πατέρα χαρίζεσθαι, ὅπως ἂν ἁρμόζουσα τάξις ἐπ' ἀμφοτέρων τῶν προσώπων φυλάττηται. ἢ οὐκ ἄτοπον ἦν εἰδότα τοῦ πατρὸς τὴν γνώμην φθάνειν τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ πατρὸς τὴν δωρεάν, καὶ ὑφαρπάζοντα διδόναι τὴν χάριν; οὕτω γοῦν καὶ πάντα μὲν διὰ τοῦ υἱοῦ ἐδημιουργήθη, βουλήσει δὲ τοῦ πατρός, ἵνα δι' ὅλου τὸ ἀκόλουθον καὶ πρέπον ἐπ' ἀμφοτέρων τῶν προσώπων φυλάττηται. διδάσκει οὖν ἡμᾶς ὁ λόγος τὴν περὶ τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ υἱοῦ ἀσύγχυτον τάξιν· ἐὰν δὲ καὶ τὸν ἐν σαρκὶ Χριστὸν λογίσῃ αἰτοῦντα, πολλῷ σοι μᾶλλον φανεῖται ὁ λόγος εὐσυνοπτότερος. Ro+m8,37 Λαμπρῶς δείξας τὴν τοῦ θεοῦ περὶ ἡμᾶς διάθεσιν καὶ τὴν τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ ἀγάπην, ἀκολούθως διδάσκει, οἵους λοιπὸν εἶναι δεῖ περὶ τὸν εὐεργέτην τοὺς εὐγνώμονας, ὥστε μηδὲ τῶν πάνυ φοβερῶν δύνασθαι διαστῆσαι ἡμᾶς τοῦ Χριστοῦ. 222 Ro+m9,20–21 Τινὲς νομίζουσι λύσιν εἶναι τοῦτο, μάλιστα Ἀστέριος ὁ Καππαδόκης οὕτω νοῶν· σὺ ὁ ἀντιλέγων μοι, πῶς ἀντιλέγεις; οὐχὶ ἀπ' ἐξουσίας τῆς κατὰ τὴν γνώμην; οὐχὶ ἀνταποκρίνῃ τῷ θεῷ, δεῖξαι θέλων ὅτι οὐκ ἀναγκάζει θεὸς καὶ δικαίους ποιεῖ; μένει γὰρ ἡ ἐξουσία τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. οὐκ ἔχει δὲ λόγον ἡ τοιάδε διάνοια, ἐπάγει γάρ· μὴ ἐρεῖ τὸ πλάσμα τῷ πλάσαντι· τί με ἐποίησας οὕτως; τοῦτο δὲ οὐκ ἔστι δεικνύντος ὅτι ἐν ἐξουσίᾳ ἐσμέν, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸ ἐναντίον. τίς οὖν ἡ ἔννοια; ἐκ περιουσίας εἴρηται τοῦτο, οὐχὶ λύσις τέθειται. τί δέ ἐστι τὸ ἐκ περιουσίας; ἀλλὰ μάλιστα μὲν σὺ τίς εἶ; θῶμεν γὰρ μηδὲ ἔχειν ἡμᾶς γνώμην, μηδὲ εἶναι αὐτεξουσίους, ἐξουσίαν οὐκ εἶχεν ὁ θεὸς ὡς ἤθελεν; ἀλλὰ κεραμεὺς μὲν πλάττει τὰ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν τὰ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν, ὁ δὲ θεὸς οὐκ ἔχει τὴν ἐξουσίαν ἣν ἔχει ὁ κεραμεύς, ὥστε τιμᾶν οὓς θέλει καὶ κολάζειν οὓς βούλεται; τοῦτο ἐκ περιουσίας εἰπὼν λοιπὸν ποιεῖται τὴν λύσιν. Ro+m9,22 Ἔνδειξιν ὀργῆς λέγει, ἣν μακροθυμῶν τοῖς ἀνθρώποις διὰ τοῦ αὐτεξουσίου συγχωρεῖ πράττειν ἃ βούλονται· σκεύη δὲ ὀργῆς κατηρτισμένα εἰς ἀπώλειαν λέγει τοὺς ἀνθρώπους τοὺς ὑπὸ τὸν ὅρον τοῦ θανάτου ὄντας. Τινές γε μὴν ἕτεροι εἰς τὸ εἰ δὲ θέλων ὁ θεὸς ἐνδείξασθαι τὴν ὀργὴν καὶ τὰ ἑξῆς, τὸ τί οἶδας; ἀπέδωκαν, ἔξωθεν ἐλλειπῶς νοούμενον. καὶ τὸ ἐν πολλῇ μακροθυμίᾳ ἀντὶ τοῦ μετὰ πολλὴν μακροθυμίαν ἐπήνεγκε τὴν ὀργήν. Ro+m10,4 Οὐχ ὡς μέρος νόμου Χριστός, ἀλλ' ὡς ἑτέρας ζωῆς ἀρχή. τέλος οὖν νόμου εἴρηται, ὡς τέλος γεγονὼς τοῦ νόμου, τοῦτ' ἔστι παύσας αὐτόν. διὰ δύο οὖν τέλος νόμου, ὅτι τε ἐχρήσατο αὐτῷ καὶ ὅτι ἔπαυσεν αὐτόν. τὸ δὲ παντὶ τῷ πιστεύοντι, ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ μόνον Ἰουδαίῳ ἀλλὰ καὶ Ἕλληνι, οὐκ, ἐπειδὴ τέλος νόμου ἤδη μόνῳ Ἰουδαίῳ. 223 Ro+m11,24 Καλλιελαίου καὶ ἀγριελαίου μνησθεὶς παρέστησεν ὅτι μία μὲν φύσις πάντων ὥσπερ καὶ τῆς ἐλαίας, οὐ μία δὲ προαίρεσις ὥσπερ ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀγρίου καὶ ἡμέρου· ἄγριον καλῶν τὸ ἀπηλλοτριωμένον καὶ ἄχρηστον τῷ δεσπότῃ, ἥμερον δὲ τὸ καρποφόρον. ἐγκεντρισμὸν δὲ καλεῖ τὸ ἐγκεντρισθῆναι ἐν τῇ πίστει τοῦ Ἀβραὰμ ὃν ῥίζαν ὀνομάζει· τὸν δὲ ἐγκεντρισμόν φησι παρέχειν ζωήν. Ro+m11,28–29 Πλὴν ἐλλειπῶς εἴρηται, διὸ καὶ ἀσύνδετόν ἐστιν. οὕτως οὖν θέλει, ὥστε ἐκ τῆς πρὸς ὑμᾶς συγκρίσεως ἐχθροὶ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐλέγχονται εἶναι οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι, ἐπειδὴ ὑμεῖς μὲν οἱ ἐξ ἐθνῶν ἐπιστεύσατε, οἱ δὲ ὀφείλοντες πρὸ πάντων πιστεῦσαι ἐπωρώθησαν τὴν καρδίαν καὶ κατὰ μὲν τοῦτον τὸν λόγον ἐχθροί εἰσι τοῦ θεοῦ, ἀγαπητοὶ δὲ διὰ τοὺς πατέρας, ὧν εἰς τιμὴν φιλανθρωπεύσεται πρὸς τοὺς ἀπογόνους αὐτῶν, καὶ ἀγαπητοὺς ἡγήσεται πιστεύσαντας καὶ πολιτείαν ἐνδειξαμένους δυναμένην σῶσαι. Ro+m12,2 Ἡ παροῦσα τοῦ κόσμου κατάστασις εἰς τρυφὰς καὶ ἡδονὰς προτρέπεται τὸν ἄνθρωπον, ὅπερ ἐάν τις ἀρνήσηται σχῆμα, καὶ εἰς παρηλλαγμένην ἑαυτὸν καὶ ξένην πολιτείαν μεταστήσει. ὡς καινὸς ἄνθρωπος γεγονὼς ἐξ ἄλλου εἰς ἄλλον