On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §234

Man. Post. Cap. IV: GAR 2 — separability / fidelium

Garissoles' second reason. Things that can really be separated are not one and the same. Someone may break the law and still not, in the act, lose habitual righteousness—as the faithful show, who sin from time to time yet keep the righteousness God works in their hearts by his Spirit.

Latin

GAR. 2. Ea non sunt unum & idem, quae reapse possunt separari. Atqui potest aliquis violare legem, qui tamen propterea justitia sua habituali actu non privabitur, quod patet exemplo fidelium, qui subinde peccant, nec tamen privantur ea justitia, quam Deus spiritu suo in ipsorum cordibus operatus est.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.