On the Trinity · §44

The Divine Names of the Holy Spirit

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

That calling him the true Son and the true Spirit denotes the appropriation of nature by God: but regarding all other things, it differs by lordship or by faith; just as we are accustomed to say regarding those who are of the same substance to us, 'my son, my spirit,' but regarding others, 'my field, my horse,' yet also 'my God.'

For the manner of the hypostatic Logos of the divine nature is not shown to have become Son and only-begotten and the Word of God, Christ, by simply and unattachedly speaking, but by having the syllable of 'my' and 'your' joined together. As when God says, 'This is my beloved Son' (Matt 3:17), and again, 'my good Word,' and, 'I prepared a lamp for my Christ'; and we say, 'your Son, your only-begotten, your Christ.'

Nor does it being called by the same name or by a similar name regarding us—'sons of men, how long will you be heavy-hearted?' (Ps 38:13)—bring forth the Son of God through the homonymy of divinity; likewise, the Holy Spirit does not simply being called 'Spirit,' but the joining to the name, or as being from God the 'my,' or as being from the creation the 'your,' or even the word 'holy' or 'incorruptible' or 'eternal,' denotes that he proceeds from the Father's hypostasis; nor does the speaking of the liturgical things and our spirits or holy or eternal things by the same name bring forth that he is by nature the true Spirit of God.

For in the riddles concerning him, some declaration of his divine nature and power is always found. But the creatures received the holy and eternal toward their own nature, not possessing these things by nature from themselves.

Since even these heretics are found arguing against themselves, that the 'my' regarding the Son of God and the 'holy' and the 'eternal' they simply accept as announcing the identity of the divine nature? Furthermore, in these matters, he did not name our soul 'spirit' in the proofs provided, but his own Holy Spirit. For having our own spirit, the Spirit of God was given to us. For the Father said, 'My Spirit shall not remain in these men' (cf. Ps 105:36), and the Son: 'Receive the Holy Spirit' (John 20:22). It is clear.

And, as it was said concerning the divine Spirit, that it is like our own indwelling Spirit. Therefore, just as the Son, the Word of God, is paternally generative, so the Holy Spirit is spiritually proceeding and not by creation. And just as there is no change in essence, power, or glory for the only-begotten Son in relation to God the Father—though any difference, if it is permissible to say so, exists in relation to creation—so also with the one divine Spirit.

Thus, it is more righteous not even to hear the heretics and to approach listening to these things. Concerning how the divine nature of the Holy Spirit is signified by various names. What we have said from the beginning, the words testify a second time: that there are various God-befitting names for the Spirit of God, having laid upon them much other emphasis and a relation surpassing all, contributing to the present theorems continuously and more excellently than the most appropriate interpretation, to both the Father and the Son.

And still replenishing both his divine nature and his authentic power, and comforting our weakness regarding our ability to reach him either by the interpretation of words or by the contemplation of the mind, and providing boldness to call him without danger consubstantial with God and to believe in his sanctification. And we find nothing of the other spirits privileged to be called by these names; but these things, which alone exist by nature, are not one of the many things, but God.

And these names are these: Holy Spirit, as it is written everywhere; Spirit of holiness, and Sanctifier, as he writes to the Romans: 'Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, and was designated the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness' (Rom 1:1-4). And again: 'that the offering of the Gentiles might be acceptable, sanctified in the Holy Spirit' (Rom 15:16), and likewise: 'we must always thank God for all of you, beloved brothers, because God chose you as a firstfruit for salvation in the sanctification of the Spirit and in the faith of truth' (1 Thess 2:13). Spirit of power and of love and of self-control, as Paul in the second epistle to...

Greek

ἀληθινοῦ υἱοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἀληθινοῦ πνεύματος λεγόμενον παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ τὴν οἰκείωσιν τῆς φύσεως δηλοῖ: ἐπὶ δὲ τῶν ἄλλων πάντων τὸ αὐτῷ κατὰ δεσποτείαν ἢ πίστιν διαφέρειν· ὡς καὶ ἡμεῖς εἰώθαμεν λέγειν ἐπὶ μὲν τῶν ὁμοουσίων ἡμῖν «ὁ υἱός μου, τὸ πνεῦμά μου», ἐπὶ δὲ τῶν ἄλλων· «ὁ ἀγρός μου, ὁ ἵππος μου», ἀλλὰ καὶ «ὁ θεός μου». 2.35 ὃν τρόπον γὰρ τὸν τῆς θείας φύσεως ἐνυπόστατον λόγον οὐ τὸ ἁπλῶς καὶ 45 ἀπολελυμένως εἰρῆσθαι υἱὸν καὶ μονογενῆ καὶ λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ Χριστὸν δείκνυσιν γεγεννῆσθαι ἐκ τῆς ὑποστάσεως τοῦ θεοῦ, ἀλλὰ τὸ ἔχειν συνημμένην τὴν συλλαβὴν τοῦ «μοῦ» καὶ «σοῦ». 2.36 ὡς ἡνίκα ὁ μὲν θεὸς λέγῃ· «οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός·» καὶ πάλιν· «ὁ λόγος μου ὁ ἀγαθός·» καί· «ἡτοίμασα λύχνον τῷ Χριστῷ μου·» ἡμεῖς δὲ ἀνευφημοῦμεν· «ὁ υἱός σου, ὁ μονογενής σου, ὁ Χριστός σου». 2.37 οὐδέ γε μὴν τὸ ὁμωνύμως ἢ συνωνύμως περὶ ἡμῶν γεγράφθαι· «υἱοὶ ἀνθρώπων, ἕως πότε βαρυκάρδιοι;» ἐξέλκει τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ θεοῦ τῇ ὁμωνυμίᾳ τῆς θεότητος· οὕτω τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα οὐ τὸ ἁπλῶς εἰρῆσθαι «πνεῦμα», ἀλλὰ τὸ συνῆφθαι τῷ ὀνόματι ἢ ὡς ἀπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ τὸ «μοῦ» ἢ ὡς ἀπὸ τῆς κτίσεως τὸ «σοῦ» ἢ καὶ τὴν «ἅγιος» ἢ «ἄφθαρτος» ἢ «αἰώνιος» λέξιν δηλοῖ ἐκπεπορεῦσθαι αὐτὸ ἐκ τῆς πατρικῆς ὑποστάσεως· οὐδέ γε μὴν τὸ ὁμωνύμως εἰρῆσθαι τὰ λειτουργικὰ καὶ τὰ ἡμῶν πνεύματα ἢ ἅγια ἢ αἰώνια ἐξέλκει αὐτὸ τοῦ κατὰ φύσιν εἶναι ἀληθινὸν πνεῦμα τοῦ θεοῦ. 2.38 καὶ ἐν τοῖς αἰνίγμασιν γὰρ αὐτοῖς τοῖς περὶ αὐτοῦ εὑρίσκεταί τις πάντως δήλωσις περὶ τῆς θείας αὐτοῦ φύσεως καὶ δυνάμεως. τὰ δὲ κτίσματα πρὸς τὴν ἑαυτῶν φύσιν ἔλαβεν τὸ ἅγιον καὶ αἰώνιον, οὐ καθάπαξ ταῦτα κατὰ φύσιν ἐξ ἑαυτῶν ἔχοντα. 2.39 ἐπεὶ μή γε αὐτοὶ οὗτοι αἱρετικοὶ εὑρίσκονται κατηγοροῦντες ἑαυτῶν, ὅτι τὸ «μοῦ» ἐπὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ καὶ τὸ «ἅγιον» καὶ τὸ «αἰώνιον» ἁπλῶς δέχονται ὡς ἀγγέλλον ταυτότητα τῆς θεϊκῆς φύσεως; ἔπειτα πρὸς τούτοις οὐ τὴν ψύχωσιν ἡμῶν πνεῦμα ὠνόμασεν ἐν ταῖς προκειμέναις ἀποδείξεσιν, ἀλλὰ τὸ αὐτοῦ ἅγιον πνεῦμα. 2.40 ἐχόντων γὰρ ἡμῶν τὸ ἴδιον πνεῦμα ἐδόθη ἡμῖν καὶ τὸ τοῦ θεοῦ. εἶπεν γὰρ ὁ πατήρ· «οὐ μὴ καταμείνῃ τὸ πνεῦμά μου ἐν τοῖς ἀνθρώποις τούτοις,» καὶ ὁ υἱὸς· «λάβετε πνεῦμα ἅγιον.» δῆλον δέ, ὡς τοῖς ἤδη ἔχουσιν τὸ οἰκεῖον ἡμῶν πνεῦμα ἐλέγετο περὶ τοῦ θεϊκοῦ πνεύματος. 2.41 καθὰ τοίνυν ὁ υἱὸς λόγος τοῦ θεοῦ υἱικῶς γεννητικός· οὕτω τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα πνευματικῶς ἐκπορευτικὸν καὶ οὐ δημιουργικῶς. καὶ ὡς οὐδεμία παραλλαγὴ οὐσίας καὶ δυνάμεως καὶ δόξης τῷ μονογενεῖ υἱῷ πρὸς τὸν θεὸν πατέρα, διαφορὰ δὲ πᾶσα, εἴ γε θέμις τοῦτο φάναι, πρὸς τὴν κτίσιν· οὕτω καὶ τῷ ἑνὶ θεϊκῷ πνεύματι. 2.42 τὸ οὖν μηδὲ ἀκούειν τὰ αἱρετικῶν τοῦ μὴ καὶ προσιέμενον αὐτὰ ἀκούειν δικαιότερον. 3.ν Περὶ τοῦ ἐκ διαφόρων ὀνομάτων σημαίνεσθαι τὴν θεϊκὴν φύσιν τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος. 3.1 ὃ δὲ ἐλέγομεν ἐξ ἀρχῆς, δεύτερον μαρτυροῦσιν τὰ λόγια, ὅτι διάφορα θεοπρεπῆ ὀνόματά ἐστιν τῷ πνεύματι τοῦ θεοῦ πολλήν τε ἄλλην ἔμφασιν ἐπηρμένην καὶ σχέσιν ὑπερτέραν πάντων, καὶ τῷ πατρὶ καὶ τῷ υἱῷ συνεχῆ καὶ κρείττονα τῆς πρεπωδεστάτης ἑρμηνείας συνεισφέροντα τοῖς προκειμένοις θεωρήμασι· 3.2 καὶ ἔτι ἀναπλοῦντα ἔνια μὲν τὴν θεϊκὴν αὐτοῦ φύσιν ἔνια δὲ τὴν αὐθεντικὴν δύναμιν, καὶ παραμυθούμενα τὴν ἀδυναμίαν ἡμῶν τὴν περὶ τὸ ἀξίως ἐφικέσθαι αὐτοῦ ἢ ἑρμηνείᾳ ῥημάτων ἢ θεωρίᾳ νοῦ, καὶ παρρησίαν παρέχοντα ἀκινδύνως ὁμοούσιον τοῦ θεοῦ καλεῖν αὐτὸ καὶ πιστεύειν τῷ ἁγιασμῷ αὐτοῦ. 3.3 καὶ οὐχ εὑρίσκομεν οὐδὲν τῶν ἄλλων πνευμάτων καταξιωθὲν κληθῆναι τοῖς ὀνόμασι τούτοις· τὸ δὲ μόνως καὶ φύσει ὑπάρχον ταῦτα οὐδέν ἐστι τῶν πάντων, ἀλλὰ θεός. 3.4 ἔστιν δὲ τὰ ὀνόματα τάδε· πνεῦμα ἅγιον, ὡς πανταχοῦ γέγραπται· πνεῦμα ἁγιοσύνης, καὶ ἁγιάζον, ὡς γράφει Ῥωμαίοις «Παῦλος, δοῦλος Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, κλητὸς ἀπόστολος ἀφωρισμένος εἰς εὐαγγέλιον θεοῦ, ὃ προεπηγγείλατο διὰ τῶν προφητῶν αὐτοῦ ἐν γραφαῖς ἁγίαις περὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ τοῦ γενομένου ἐκ σπέρματος ∆αυὶδ κατὰ σάρκα, τοῦ ὁρισθέντος υἱοῦ θεοῦ ἐν δυνάμει κατὰ πνεῦμα ἁγιοσύνης,» 3.5 καὶ πάλιν· «ἵνα γένηται ἡ προσφορὰ τῶν ἐθνῶν εὐπρόσδεκτος, 46 ἡγιασμένη ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ», καὶ ἑτέρωθι· «ἡμεῖς δὲ ὀφείλομεν εὐχαριστεῖν τῷ θεῷ πάντοτε περὶ ὑμῶν, ἀδελφοὶ ἠγαπημένοι ὑπὸ κυρίου, ὅτι εἵλετο ὑμᾶς ὁ θεὸς ἀπαρχὴν εἰς σωτηρίαν ἐν ἁγιασ μῷ πνεύματος καὶ πίστει ἀληθείας.» 3.6 πνεῦμα δυνάμεως καὶ ἀγάπης καὶ σωφρονισμοῦ, ὡς Παῦλος ἐν δευτέρᾳ ἐπιστολῇ πρὸς

About this text

Didymus the Blind defends the full divinity of Father, Son, and Spirit against those who rank them.

Catalogue & scope

Khazarzar scan

Witnesses

  • Copy-text PG (Khazarzar) (Greek)

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Greek on each section for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.