On the Resurrection of the Dead · §25 · Athenagoras

The end belongs to the whole person, so resurrection is necessary

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Athenagoras is concluding his argument that the proper end of human life belongs to the whole person, not to the soul alone, and therefore the resurrection of bodies must occur.

Nor is the blessedness of a soul separated from its body the point at issue. We were not examining the life or end of one of the two parts from which a human being is composed, but of the being composed of both. For every human being who has obtained this present life is such a being, and there must be some end proper to his life. If the end belongs to the whole person, and this end cannot be found while they are still living this present life, for the reasons already stated many times, nor while the soul exists in separation—since such a human being no longer exists once the body has been dissolved or entirely scattered, even if the soul remains by itself—then it is absolutely necessary that the end of human beings appear in some other composition of the whole person and of the same living being. Since this follows by necessity, there must certainly be a resurrection of bodies that have died or been entirely dissolved, and the same human beings must be composed again. For the law of nature sets the end not simply, nor for just any human beings, but for those very persons who lived the previous life; and it is impossible for the same human beings to be composed again unless the same bodies are given back to the same souls. For the same body to receive back the same soul is impossible in any other way, but possible only through the resurrection. When this takes place, the end proper to human nature follows as well. As for the end of an intelligent and rational life, one would not be wrong to say that it is to abide undistractedly with those things to which the natural reason is chiefly and primarily fitted, and to rejoice unceasingly in the contemplation of the One who is and of what he has decreed—even if the majority of human beings, having clung too passionately and violently to the things of this world, miss this end. For the multitude of those who fall away from the end proper to them does not nullify the shared allotment, since the examination of these matters is particular, and honor or punishment is measured out to each person for a life lived well or badly.

Greek

Οὐ μὴν οὐδὲ μακαριότης ψυχῆς κεχωρισμένης σώματος· οὐδὲ γὰρ τὴν θατέρου τούτων ἐξ ὧν συνέστηκεν ἄνθρωπος ἐσκοποῦμεν ζωὴν ἢ τέλος, ἀλλὰ τοῦ συνεστῶτος ἐξ ἀμφοῖν· τοιοῦτος γὰρ πᾶς ὁ τόνδε τὸν βίον λαχὼν ἄνθρωπος, καὶ δεῖ τῆς τούτου ζωῆς εἶναί τι τέλος οἰκεῖον. Εἰ δὲ τοῦ συναμφοτέρου τὸ τέλος, τοῦτο δὲ οὔτε ζώντων αὐτῶν ἔτι κατὰ τόνδε τὸν βίον εὑρεθῆναι δυνατὸν διὰ τὰς πολλάκις ἤδη ῥηθείσας αἰτίας, οὔτε μὴν ἐν χωρισμῷ τυγχανούσης τῆς ψυχῆς, τῷ μηδὲ συνεστάναι τὸν τοιοῦτον ἄνθρωπον διαλυθέντος ἢ καὶ πάντη σκεδασθέντος τοῦ σώματος, κἂν ἡ ψυχὴ διαμένῃ καθ᾿ ἑαυτήν, ἀνάγκη πᾶσα κατ᾿ ἄλλην τινὰ τοῦ συναμφοτέρου καὶ τοῦ αὐτοῦ ζώου σύστασιν τὸ τῶν ἀνθρώπων φανῆναι τέλος. Τούτου δ᾿ ἐξ ἀνάγκης ἑπομένου, δεῖ πάντως γενέσθαι τῶν νεκρωθέντων ἢ καὶ πάντη διαλυθέντων σωμάτων ἀνάστασιν καὶ τοὺς αὐτοὺς ἀνθρώπους συστῆναι πάλιν· ἐπειδή γε τὸ μὲν τέλος οὐχ ἁπλῶς, οὐδὲ τῶν ἐπιτυχόντων ἀνθρώπων, ὁ τῆς φύσεως τίθεται νόμος, ἀλλ᾿ αὐτῶν ἐκείνων τῶν κατὰ τὴν προλαβοῦσαν ζωὴν βεβιωκότων, τοὺς δ᾿ αὐτοὺς ἀνθρώπους συστῆναι πάλιν ἀμήχανον, μὴ τῶν αὐτῶν σωμάτων ταῖς αὐταῖς ψυχαῖς ἀποδοθέντων. Τὸ δ᾿ αὐτὸ σῶμα τὴν αὐτὴν ψυχὴν ἀπολαβεῖν ἄλλως μὲν ἀδύνατον, κατὰ μόνην δὲ τὴν ἀνάστασιν δυνατόν· ταύτης γὰρ γενομένης καὶ τὸ τῇ φύσει τῶν ἀνθρώπων πρόσφορον ἐπακολουθεῖ τέλος. Τέλος δὲ ζωῆς ἔμφρονος καὶ λογικῆς κρίσεως οὐκ ἂν ἁμάρτοι τις εἰπὼν τὸ τούτοις ἀπερισπάστως συνδιαιωνίζειν οἷς μάλιστα καὶ πρώτως ὁ φυσικὸς συνήρμοσται λόγος, τῇ τε θεωρίᾳ τοῦ ὄντος καὶ τῶν ἐκείνῳ δεδογμένων ἀπαύστως ἐπαγάλλεσθαι· κἂν οἱ πολλοὶ τῶν ἀνθρώπων ἐμπαθέστερον καὶ σφοδρότερον τοῖς τῇδε προσπεπονθότες ἄστοχοι τούτου διατελῶσιν. Οὐ γὰρ ἀκυροῖ τὴν κοινὴν ἀποκλήρωσιν τὸ πλῆθος τῶν ἀποπιπτόντων τοῦ προσήκοντος αὐτοῖς τέλους, ἰδιαζούσης τῆς ἐπὶ τούτοις ἐξετάσεως καὶ τῆς ἑκάστῳ συμμετρουμένης ὑπὲρ τῶν εὖ ἢ κακῶς βεβιωμένων τιμῆς ἢ δίκης.

About this text

Athenagoras argues that God can raise the dead, and that the rising of the body fits God's purpose, human nature, and justice.

Athenagoras (fl. c. 177) was an Athenian philosopher who converted to Christianity and wrote in Greek as a Christian apologist. This treatise is addressed to those who disbelieve or doubt the resurrection of the dead, urging them to examine the question rationally rather than by idle speculation. He wrote to show that bodily resurrection is both possible for God and consistent with God's purpose, human nature, and divine justice.

The work answers pagan philosophers and other critics who claimed that resurrection was impossible or contrary to God's will. Athenagoras first argues that disbelief is unreasonable unless critics can prove resurrection impossible or unwilled by God. He then shows that God's knowledge and power make resurrection possible, and that apparent difficulties such as bodies eaten by animals do not prevent it, because only what is truly proper food can be united to a body.

A reader will meet the critics who raise objections, including the mythological figure Thyestes as an example of cannibalism, and an unnamed apostle quoted as saying that the corruptible must put on incorruptibility. Athenagoras argues from God's purpose in creating humans, from human nature as a compound of soul and body, and from divine justice, which requires that the whole human being receive reward or punishment. The apostle quoted is Paul, and the saying about the corruptible putting on incorruptibility comes from 1 Corinthians 15:54.

New English from the Greek base text; no published English used as wording.

Printed text used

Translated from Athenagorae Philosophi Atheniensis Opera Athenagoras Johann Karl Theodor von Otto Mauke Jena 1857 (Greek)

This work has not yet been re-checked against its source. This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Greek on each section for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.