A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §598

Annotatio IV §.XX: Taborite ‘with/in bread’ formulas seem Lutheran In/Cum/Sub — but Hoc is bread only

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

A Taborite article neither Danhauer nor Strauch noted could seem to serve junior-Waldenses–Lutheran consensus: ‘with the bread truly Christ’s body’ and ‘Christ’s body in the bread’ — formulas matching Lutheran In, Cum, and Sub.

But (1) in the same article the Taborites make Hoc in ‘This is my Body’ point to nothing but the bread — wholly alien to the modern Lutheran mind.

Latin

Equidem pro Consensu Waldensium Juniorum cum Lutheranis in puncto de S. Cœna, introduci posset, Articulus primus Taboritarum contra Papistas Pragenses de præsentia & adoratione Christi in Sacramento, à neutro licet Theologorum binorum, in Dissertationibus eorum notatus, quô expressè perhibent: Cum pane verè esse corpus Christi de Virgine sumtum pro nobis traditum. Item: Corpus Christi in pane esse: Quæ duæ formulæ dicendi exactè respondent tô In, Cum, & Sub Lutherano. At (1) In eodem articulo contendunt Taboritæ, pronomen, Hoc, in propositione Christi: hoc est Corpus meum, aliud nihil, quàm panem demonstrare, id quod à mente Lutheranorum modernorum omnino alienum est.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.