A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §460

Annotatio III §.X (1) cont.: Forbes points to Picherellus and Spalatinus among Pontificians themselves

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Forbes, with many learned Protestants, has shown the dogma adverse to Scripture.

He also begs readers to weigh Pontificians against themselves: Picherellus on the Institution-words and the Mass, and Spalatinus De Republ. Eccles. 5.6 (Fabricius p. 600) refuting it at length.

Latin

Reverendiss. Guil. Forbesius præter multos ex Doctissimis Protestantibus, qui dogma Transsubstantiationis Scripturis adversari luculentissimè demonstrarunt, obsecrat quoque lectorem, adire, ex pontificiis ipsis, eruditam Picherelli Expositionem verborum Institutionis Coenæ Domini & ejusdem Dissertat. de Missa legere diligentissimeque considerare, necnon Archi-Ep. Spalatinum l. 5. de Republ. Eccles. cap. 6., fusissime hoc dogma impugnantem & refellentem Edit. Fabrician. noviss. p. 600. in media.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.