A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §400

Annotatio II §.VIII: Scotus and Durandus (1320) tolerate revival; Aquinas not to be dragged in

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Some Scholastics did not reject the revival — Scotus early in the 14th century, and Durandus in 1320 (Otrokocsi, Irenicum VI.27ff.).

Aquinas is not to be dragged into this consent by Dorsche, even if he grants Transubstantiation is not proved from the Institution words alone.

Latin

Non-improbata Scholasticis nonnullis, sigillatim Scoto, subtili doctori, initio seculi XIV, famosissimoque Durando, Anno 1320, quorum testimonia lege apud Franciscum Foris Otrokocsi in Irenico Cap. 6. §. 27. & seq. non item Thomæ Aquinati, à Dorschæo, hoc locô, neutiquam in Consensum trahi merito, quanquam fassus introducatur Transsubstantiationem ex verbis Institutionis probari haud posse.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.