A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §145

§.XII late (2): Partial assent / Art. X hardness — Tetrapolitani; refused or barred from subscription

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Or (2) they sincerely agree with most of the Confession, yet because of a harder phrasing in one article or another — above all the tenth — they have neither taken the whole Confession nor subscribed, whether by their own abstention or because others barred them.

Such were the so-called Tetrapolitans of Strasbourg, Memmingen, Constance, and Lindau, who once followed Zwingli on the Supper and therefore presented their own Confession at the Augsburg Diet, which the Emperor meant to reject together with the Augsburg.

Chytraeus, pp. 678–679. Our writers (Pareus, Georg Pauli, and others) show that they refused subscription; others, citing Chytraeus's History p. 130, hold that the Protestant Estates' judgment at least partly forced them not to subscribe.

Latin

Vel (2.) plerisque saltem dictae Confessionis, sincero animo adstipulantur, licèt ob duriorem unam vel alteram Articuli, maximè decimi, phrasin haud omnino admissam, nec amplexi Confessionem in totum sint, nec ei subscripserint, à Subscriptione vel semet abstinentes ipsos, vel ab aliis prohibiti: Quales Tetrapolitani vulgò dicti, Argentinenses, Memmingenses, Constantienses & Lindavienses, Zwinglii Dogma de S. Coena olim secuti, exhibitâ ob id peculiari in Comitiis Augustanis, Confessione, una tamen, cum Augustana, à Caesare rejicienda. Chytr. pag. 678. 679. Renuisse hos subscribere Augustanae Confessioni, ostendunt passim Nostrates, Pareus, Georgius Pauli, &c. aliis interim e Chytraeo Historia, pag. 130. sustinentibus, eos à subscribendo, ex Statuum Protestanticorum sententia, per plura saltem, coercitos fuisse.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.