A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §104

Annotatio I: Spanheim's rubric on controversies with Augsburg-Confession theologians asks three questions

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

ANNOTATION I. On the Augsburg Confession and its theologians and associates — keyed to these words of the Author's rubric:

Chief Controversies with the theologians of the Augsburg Confession, as they are called.

§. I. That rubric of our celebrated Author, by which he titles the Protestant Controversies, bids us press three inquiries, or settle them more sharply:

[I.] What the Augsburg Confession is, and of what kind.

[II.] Who count as its theologians, and who as its confessors or associates at large?

[III.] In what sense some men, ahead of others, are called Augsburg-Confession theologians — or rather have grown used, not without spleen, to calling themselves so, and still do.

Latin

ANNOTATIO I. De Augustana Confessione hujusque Theologis ac Sociis, ad haec Rubricae Auctoris verba: Praecipuae Controversiae cum Augustanae Confessionis, ut vocantur, Theologis. §. I. Rubrica Auctoris nostri celeberrimi, quâ Controversias Protestanticas inscribit, Tria admodum nos inquirere jubet distinctiùsve determinare [I.] Quid & qua sit Augustana Confessio. [II.] Quinam Confessionis istius tam Theologi, quam Confessores seu Socii promiscuè? [III.] Quô Sensu nonnulli, prae aliis, Confessionis Augustanae Theologi vocitentur, vel se potiùs ipsos, non sine stomacho, vocitare consueverint & hodienum consuescant.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.