On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §85

Cap. VIII: Remote cause yes; deny inhering sin or drop immediate imputation

Next I distinguish "on account of" as above. It marks either a remote cause or a proximate one. If the remote, the whole argument is granted; if the proximate, the premise is denied. For, as I have driven home many times, Adam's first actual sin is the cause of our inhering sin, and this is the cause of death; and what is the cause of a cause is also the cause of the effect. Either, with Pelagius, Pighius, and Socinus, drop immediate imputation or deny inhering sin

Latin

Deinde distinguo propter ut supra. Nam vel causam remotam designat, vel proximam. Si illam, conceditur totum argumentum; si hanc, negatur propositio. Est enim, ut multoties inculcavi, primum Adami peccatum actuale causa nostri peccati inhaerentis, & hoc causa mortis: quod autem est causa causae, id causa est etiam effectus. Aut cum Pelagio, Pighio, & Socino negandum est peccatum inhaerens ejusque reatus, aut impossibile est ex verbis Apostoli imputationem peccati Adae actualis antecedentem seu immediatam efficere.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.