On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §668

Man. Post. Cap. X: PLAC — I did not argue from non-duration of imputation; you twist my case

PLAC. I did not gather that Adam’s disobedience was not imputed until the law because it did not endure until the law.

My argument, which is invincible, the learned man transforms into another, inept and absurd, which he can then easily both traduce and refute.

Latin

PLAC. Non collegi inobedientiam Adami non fuisse imputatam usque ad legem, quia non perduravit usque ad legem. Argumentum meum, quod est invictum, Vir doctus in aliud transmutat ineptum & absurdum, quod possit facile & traducere, & refellere.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.