On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §646

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC tip — that denial can also be shown by the next argument (imputation vs inherent)

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Which very thing can also be brought about by this argument, so that you may see more and more how pernicious that opinion is from which I desire and strive to move you.

Latin

Quod ipsum etiam effici potest hoc argumento, ut videas magis magisque quam perniciosa sit illa sententia, a qua te dimovere cupio & conor.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.