On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §579

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — we 'sinned in Adam' when born corrupted; opponent cannot so answer

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

What absurdity is there in that? And yet the learned man could not so answer, inasmuch as he will have Adam's sin to have been imputed to us already from that time when Adam fell.

Latin

Quid in eo est absurdi? Nec tamen sic potuit respondere Vir doctus, quippe qui velit peccatum Adami nobis, iam ab eo tempore quo lapsum est Adam, fuisse imputatum.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.