On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §577

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — split double question: when Christ satisfied vs when imputed

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Besides, the proposition when we satisfy in Christ, since it is not proper, needs exposition, and is to be recalled to the proper: otherwise the fallacy of many questions is committed: for it contains these two questions: 1. When did Christ satisfy? 2. When is Christ's satisfaction imputed to us? To that I answer, when he suffered on the cross; to this, when we believe in him.

Latin

Praeterea propositio quando satisfacimus in Christo, cum propria non sit, eget expositione, & revocanda est ad propriam: alioqui committitur fallacia plurium interrogationum: continet enim has duas quaestiones: 1. Quando Christus satisfecit? 2. Quando nobis Christi satisfactio imputatur? Ad illam respondeo, quando passus est in cruce; Ad hanc, quando credimus in eum.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.