On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §575

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — can we say of sin 'another sinned for us / in our place'?

We have not satisfied, but another, namely Christ, has satisfied for us. Can the same be said of sin: We have not sinned, but another has sinned for us, or in our place?

Latin

Nos non satisfecimus, sed alius, nempe Christus, pro nobis satisfecit. Idemne dici potest de peccato, Nos non peccavimus, sed alius peccavit pro nobis, aut loco nostro?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.