On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §553

Man. Post. Cap. IX: GAR — so 'sin in Adam' may = be held guilty as if we ourselves sinned

What then will be new in this, if we teach that the same metalepsis familiar to the Hebrews is used here, so that we are said to sin in Adam, that is, to be held as guilty, no less than if we ourselves had sinned when Adam sinned?d?d?. Mark that well.

Latin

Quid igitur in eo novi erit, si eandem metalepsin Hebraeis familiarem hic usurpari doceamus, ut dicamur in Adamo peccare, id est, pro reis haberi, non minus quam si, Adamo peccante, nos ipsi peccavissemus?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.