On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §532

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — absolute 'death' ≠ corruption; tip before all-are-sinners proof

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Then you will bring in the Apostle against his custom, with the name of death set absolutely, and without any addition, signifying corruption of that kind, and one and the same name set once, to be understood once, taking it at once properly and figuratively. Besides, who would believe that death, when it is distinguished from sin, as is done in this place, signifies sin?

Latin

Tum Apostolum induces contra suum morem nomine mortis absolute posito, & sine ulla additione, eiusmodi corruptionem significantem, unumque & idem nomen semel positum, semel intelligendum, simul proprie & figurate accipientem. Praeterea, quis credat mortem cum a peccato distinguitur, ut fit hoc loco, peccatum significare?

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.