On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §501

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — corruption truly sin; reatus even of infants

Is corruption not truly sin? Does guiltot follow from it? Does it not make all and each human, not even little ones excepted still hiding in their mothers' womb, guilty of eternal death before God? Must we not first of all be justified from it? It is strange that those who accuse us of innovated doctrine depart so openly from the doctrine received by all Protestants.

Latin

PLAC. Quid? Nonne corruptio est vere peccatum? Nonne ex illa consequitur reatus? Nonne omnes & singulos homines, ne parvulis quidem exceptis adhuc in utero matrum delitescentibus, aeternae mortis reos coram Deo peragit? Nonne ab ea nos imprimis justificari oportet? Mirum est qui nos innovatae doctrinae accusant, tam aperte a recepta ab omnibus Protestantibus doctrina discedere.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.