On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §359

Man. Post. Cap. VI: GAR Tertio — Calvin nature vs judgment opener tip

d, since in this cause Calvin and the Theologians oppose these two—to be done by the force of nature, and to be done from the reason of divine judgment—how does the learned man say that is done by God's just judgment which is done so naturally that it cannot be hindered except against the order of nature, and unless the laws of natural propagation are overturned, and unless the sequel and natural efficacy of actual sin is stopped and checked?

Latin

GAR. Tertio cum in hac causa Calvinus & Theologi haec duo opponunt, fieri ex vi naturae, & fieri ex ratione judicii divini; quomodo vir doctus illud fieri dicit justo Dei judicio, quod fit ita naturaliter, ut impediri non possit, nisi contra naturae ordinem, & nisi evertantur leges naturalis propagationis, & nisi sistatur, & sufflaminetur peccati actualis sequela & efficacia naturalis?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.