On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §193

Man. Post. Cap. II GAR: Deinde — habitus left in Adam how our hereditary sin?

Garissoles: Next—by what account can that habit left in Adam's soul be called our hereditary sin? Has that habit in Adam's soul not long since ceased to exist? How then can it still be, or inhere in us as in a subject? How can one single habit—one and the same accident in number—pass into so many different subjects, countless?

Latin

GAR. Deinde, qua ratione habitus ille in Adami anima relictus, dici potest peccatum nostrum haereditarium? habitus ille in Adami anima, nonne diu est cum esse desiit? Quomodo igitur esse amplius potest, aut nobis subjective inhaerere? imo qui fieri potest, ut unicus habitus, id est unum idemque numero accidens, in tam diversa, adeoque infinita pene subjecta transeat?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.