The charge that Christians shun the educated
Next after this Celsus brings forward what is said, contrary to the teaching of Jesus, by a very few who are thought to be Christians, not, as he supposes, the more intelligent, but the most ignorant; and he says that they give orders such as these: “ ‘Let no one who is educated come near, no one wise, no one sensible; for these things are counted evil among us. But if anyone is ignorant, if anyone is foolish, if anyone is uneducated, if anyone is a child, let him come with confidence.’ For by admitting outright that these are worthy of their God, they make it plain that they wish to persuade, and are able to persuade, only the simple-minded, the low-born and the dull, slaves, silly women and little children.”
To this too we reply as follows. Suppose that, while Jesus teaches about self-control and says, “Whoever looks at a woman so as to desire her has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28), someone saw a few, out of so many who are thought to be Christians, living licentiously. He would be entirely reasonable in blaming them for living contrary to the teaching of Jesus, but he would act entirely unreasonably if he fastened the charge against them on the teaching itself. In the same way, if the teaching of Christians is found to summon people to wisdom as much as any other, then the blame must fall on those who plead in defence of their own ignorance, and who say, not the things Celsus recorded (for even if some are unlettered and ignorant, they do not speak so shamelessly), but other things, far milder, that turn people away from the pursuit of wisdom.
Greek
Εἶθ᾿ ἑξῆς τούτοις ὁ Κέλσος τὰ ὑπὸ ὀλίγων πάνυ παρὰ τὴν διδασκαλίαν Ἰησοῦ λεγόμενα νομιζομένων Χριστιανῶν. οὐ φρονιμωτέρων. ὡς οἴεται, ἀλλ᾿ ἀμαθεστάτων, φέρων φησὶ τοιαῦτα ὑπ᾿ αὐτῶν προστάσσεσθαι· μηδεὶς προσίτω πεπαιδευμένος. μηδεὶς σοφὸς, μηδεὶς φρόνιμος· κακὰ γὰρ ταῦτα νομίζεται παρ᾿ ἡμῖν· ἀλλ᾿ εἴ τις ἀμαθὴς, εἴ τις ἀνόητος, εἴ τις ἀπαίδευτος, εἴ τις νήπιος, θαῤῥῶν ἡκέτω. τούτους γὰρ ἀξίους (εἶναι) τοῦ σφετέρου θεοῦ αὐτόθεν ὁμολογοῦντες, δῆλοί εἰσιν ὅτι μόνους τοὺς ἠλιθίους καὶ ἀγεννεῖς καὶ ἀναισθήτους καὶ ἀνδράποδα καὶ γύναια καὶ παιδάρια πείθειν ἐθέλουσί τε καὶ δύνανται. καὶ πρὸς ταῦτα δέ φαμεν ὅτι. ὥσπερ εἴ τις. τοῦ Ἰησοῦ διδάσκοντος τὰ περὶ σωφροσύνης καὶ λέγοντος· „ὃς ἐὰν ἐμβλέψῃ γυναικὶ πρὸς τὸ ἐπιθυμῆσαι. ἤδη ἐμοίχευσεν αὐτὴν ἐν τῇ καρδίᾳ αὐτοῦ“, ἑώρα (τινὰς) ὀλίγους ἀπὸ τῶν τοσούτων Χριστιανοὺς εἶναι νομιζομένους ἀκολάστως ζῶντας, εὐλογώτατα μὲν (ἂν) αὐτοῖς ἐνεκάλει παρὰ τὴν Ἰησοῦ βιοῦσι διδασκαλίαν ἀλογώτατα δ᾿ ἂν ἐποίησεν, εἰ τὸ κατ᾿ ἐκείνων ἔγκλημα τῷ λόγῳ προσῆπτεν· οὕτως ἐὰν εὑρίσκηται οὐδενὸς ἧττον ὁ Χριστιανῶν λόγος ἐπὶ σοφίαν προκαλούμενος, ἐγκλητέον μὲν ἔσται τοῖς συναγορεύουσι τῇ σφῶν ἀμαθίᾳ καὶ λέγουσιν οὐ ταῦτα μὲν, ἅπερ ὁ Κέλσος ἀνέγραψεν (οὐδὲ γὰρ οὕτως ἀναισχύντως. κἂν ἰδιῶταί τινες ὦσι καὶ ἀμαθεῖς, λέγουσιν), ἕτερα δὲ πολλῷ ἐλάττονα καὶ ἀποτρεπτικὰ τοῦ ἀσκεῖν σοφίαν.