Table companions have often turned traitor
See too how superficial, and how plainly false, this statement of Celsus is. He declared that one who had shared a man’s table would not plot against him; and if he would not plot against a man, much less would one who had feasted with a god become his plotter. For who does not know that many who have shared salt and table have plotted against those who shared their hearth? The history of Greeks and barbarians is full of such examples. The iambic poet of Paros, reproaching Lycambes for breaking his agreements after “salt and table”, says to him: “You broke a great oath, and salt and table” (Archilochus).
Those who care for learning from histories, and have given themselves wholly to it, leaving aside the more necessary studies about how one ought to live, will cite more examples showing that men who shared a table with others plotted against them.
Greek
Ὅρα δὲ καὶ τὸ ἐπιπόλαιον καὶ τὸ ἄντικρυς ψεῦδος τῆς τοιαύτης τοῦ Κέλσου λέξεως. ἀποφηναμένου ὅτι ἀνθρώπῳ μὲν ὁ κοινωνήσας τραπέζης οὐκ ἂν αὐτῷ ἐπιβουλεύσειεν· εἰ δὲ ἀνθρώπῳ οὐκ ἂν ἐπιβουλεύσειε. πολλῷ πλέον ὁ θεῷ συνευωχηθεὶς οὐκ ἂν αὐτῷ ἐπίβουλος ἐγίνετο. τίς γὰρ οὐκ οἶδεν ὅτι πολλοὶ κοινωνήσαντες ἁλῶν καὶ τραπέζης ἐπεβούλευσαν τοῖς συνεστίοις; καὶ πλήρης ἐστὶν ἡ Ἑλλήνων καὶ βαρβάρων ἱστορία τοιούτων παραδειγμάτων· καὶ ὀνειδίζων γε ὁ Πάριος ἰαμβοποιὸς τὸν Λυκάμβην, μετὰ „ἅλας καὶ τράπεζαν“ συνθήκας ἀθετήσαντα. φησὶ πρὸς αὐτόν· ὅρκον δ᾿ ἐνοσφίσθης μέγαν ἅλας τε καὶ τράπεζαν. οἷς δὲ μέλει τῆς ἐν ἱστορίαις φιλομαθίας, σλοις γενομένοις αὐτῆς καὶ καταλιποῦσι τὰ ἀναγκαιότερα περὶ τοῦ ὡς δὴ βιωτέον μαθήματα. πλείονα παραθήσονται δεικνύντες ὡς οἱ κοινωνήσαντες τραπέζης τισὶν ἐπεβούλευσαν αὐτοῖς.