His eating and his voice
He says: “Nor does the body of a god eat such food,” on the ground that he can show from the Gospel writings that Jesus ate, and what kind of food he ate. Well, let it be so: let him say that Jesus ate the Passover with his disciples, not only saying, “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you” (Luke 22:15), but also eating it; and let him say that Jesus also became thirsty and drank at Jacob's well (John 4:6–7). What has this to do with what we say about his body? And he is plainly shown to have eaten fish after the resurrection (Luke 24:42–43). For according to us he took on a body, as one “born of a woman” (Galatians 4:4).
“But neither,” he says, “does the body of a god use such a voice, or such a way of persuading.” These objections too are trivial and wholly contemptible. For it will be said to him that he whom the Greeks believe to be a god, the Pythian and Didymaean, uses a voice of just this kind, that of the Pythia or of the prophetess who served at Miletus; and yet the Greeks do not on that account charge the Pythian or the Didymaean, or any other Greek god of this kind enshrined in a single place, with not being a god. But it was far better than this for God to use a voice which, because it was proclaimed with power, produced in those who heard it a persuasion beyond words.
Greek
Λέγει δ᾿ ὅτι οὐδὲ τοιαῦτα σιτεῖται σῶμα θεοῦ, ὡς ἔχων αὐτὸν παραστῆσαι ἀπὸ τῶν εὐαγγελικῶν γραμμάτων σιτούμενον, καὶ ποῖα σιτούμενον. ἀλλ᾿ ἔστω, λεγέτω αὐτὸν βεβρωκέναι μετὰ τῶν μαθητῶν τὸ πάσχα, οὐ μόνον εἰπόντα τό· „ἐπιθυμίᾳ ἐπεθύμησα τοῦτο τὸ πάσχα φαγεῖν μεθ᾿ ὑμῶν“ ἀλλὰ καὶ βεβρωκότα, λεγέτω δ᾿ αὐτὸν καὶ διψήσαντα παρὰ τῇ πηγῇ τοῦ Ἰακὼβ πεπωκέναι· τί τοῦτο πρὸς τὰ περὶ τοῦ σώματος αὐτοῦ ὑφ᾿ ἡμῶν λεγόμενα; σαφῶς δὲ φαίνεται ἰχθύος μετὰ τὴν ἀνάστασιν βεβρωκώς· κατὰ γὰρ ἡμᾶς σῶμα ἀνείληφεν, ὡς γενόμενος „ἐκ γυναικός.“ ἀλλ᾿ οὐδὲ σῶμα, φησὶ, θεοῦ χρῆται τοιαύτῃ φωνῇ οὐδὲ τοιᾷδε πειθοῖ. καὶ ταῦτα δ᾿ εὐτελῆ καὶ σφόδρα εὐκαταφρόνητα· λελέξεται γὰρ πρὸς αὐτὸν ὅτι χρῆται ὁ πεπιστευμένος παρ᾿ Ἕλλησιν εἶναι θεὸς ὁ Πύθιος καὶ ὁ Διδυμεὺς τοιᾷδε φωνῇ τῇ τῆς Πυθίας ἢ τῆς ἐν Μιλήτῳ γενομένης προφήτιδος· καὶ οὐ διὰ τοῦτο ἐγκαλεῖται παρ᾿ Ἕλλησιν ὡς οὐ θεὸς ὁ Πύθιος ἢ ὁ Διδυμεὺς ἤ τις ἄλλος τοιοῦτος ἑνὶ τόπῳ ἐγκαθιδρυμένος Ἑλληνικὸς θεός. πολλῷ δὲ τούτου βέλτιον ἦν χρήσασθαι τὸν θεὸν φωνῇ ἐμποιούσῃ διὰ τὸ μετὰ δυνάμεως ἀπαγγέλλεσθαι ἄφατόν τινα πειθὼ τοῖς ἀκούουσιν.