Theological Theses · §2

Theology is not required of every person for salvation, yet the church cannot stand without it

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Many things are commonly disputed about theology in the schools. But what we now propose to teach on this subject will be referred to these heads: first, what and how great is the necessity of theology; second, what is its nature, where we must inquire into its genus and difference; third, what is the dignity of theology and its excellence above the remaining sciences.

As to the first: it is certain that theology is not in itself necessary for each person unto salvation — that is, it is not necessary that all who come to eternal life be endowed with theological science. For in the church all are not teachers, as the Apostle teaches (1 Corinthians 12:29); nor are they for that reason deprived of salvation. For the salvation of individuals, faith suffices; a fuller and wider knowledge of the things of faith is not necessarily required.

Nevertheless theology — that is, such a science of divine things as can defend, explain, and commend the faith itself — is necessary in the church, so that the church may stand and be preserved, and so that individuals may obtain salvation. This the Apostle teaches (Ephesians 4:11-14), where besides other things he affirms that Christ appointed teachers in his church for the perfecting of the saints and the building up of the body of Christ, and so that we may not be children tossed and carried about by every wind of teaching. From this it is plain that there is danger, if there are no teachers in the church, that its frame be dissolved, the building fall, and private persons fall away from the faith, carried off by many and various errors. And the same Apostle requires as a necessary condition in a bishop that he be able to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict (Titus 1:9) — which cannot be done by one who is not more learned in sacred things than the common run of the faithful.

Latin

V. De Theologia autem in Scholis multa disceptari solent. Sed quae nunc de hoc argumento docere nobis propositum est ad haec capita referentur. 1. Quae sit, et quanta Theologiae necessitas. 2. Quae sit illius natura, ubi in genus ejus et differentiam inquirendum. 3. Denique quae sit Theologiae dignitas, et praestantia supra reliquas scientias. VI. Quod ad primum attinet, certum est Theologiam per se non esse singulis ad salutem necessariam, id est, non esse necesse, ut omnes qui ad vitam aeternam perveniunt, Theologica sint scientia praediti: in Ecclesia enim omnes non sunt doctores ut docet Apostolus 1. Cor. 12. nec ob id tamen salute privantur. Siquidem ad singulorum salutem sufficit fides, non vero necessario exigitur de rebus fidei plenior et amplior cognitio. VII. Verumtamen Theologia, hoc est, talis de rebus divinis scientia, quae ipsam fidem tueri, explicare et suadere possit, in Ecclesia necessaria est, ad hoc ut Ecclesia stet et conservari queat, adeoque ut singuli salutem consequantur. Hoc docet Apostolus Ephes. 4. Ubi praeter caetera affirmat Christum in Ecclesia sua doctores instituisse εἰς καταρτισμὸν τῶν ἁγίων ad concinnationem sanctorum et corporis Christi aedificationem: et ne simus pueri qui fluctuemus et circumferamur omni vento doctrinae. Unde patet periculum esse, ne, si doctores in Ecclesia non sint, ejus compages dissolvatur, et aedificium ruat, privatique a fide excedant, multis et variis erroribus abrepti. Praetereaque idem Apostolus Tit. 1. exigit, tanquam conditionem in Episcopo necessariam, ut potens sit exhortari in doctrina sana, et eos qui contradicunt redarguere: quod praestare non potest is, qui in sacris eruditus non est supra fidelium vulgus.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.