Inferences 1-2: canonical authority for each listed book; one unchanging canon reason
From which we conclude: (1) That canonical authority belongs to each of the Old and New Testament books enumerated by us below — from Moses to Malachi and from Matthew to the Apocalypse.
(2) That the Old and New canons' reason is one and the same, which no antiquity obliterates and no novelty varies. Hence the papal distinction between a Hebrew and a Christian canon as to the Old Testament is null — as is also the doubling of the Hebrew canon so that one would be of the Hebrew prophets and another of the Seventy interpreters, which Genebrard has in the preface of Chronology to Arnold Pontanus.
Stapleton also errs, Principles of Doctrine book 9 chapter 6, asserting that certain non-canonical books can become canonical — namely those written in the Apostles' time. And Tanner, Disputation 1 on Thomas part 1, Disputation 5 on the written and unwritten word, thesis 37: "It is not," he says, "altogether improbable what some say, that the Church can even now receive some book newly into the canon." Whom Bellarmine rightly contradicts, On the Word of God book 1 chapter 10: "We confess," he says, "that the church can IN NO WAY make a non-canonical book canonical: but only declare which is to be held for canonical."
Latin
E quibus concludimus, 1. Canonicam autoritatem ad singulos V. & N.T. libros a Mose ad Malachiam & a Matthaeo ad Apocalypsin nobis infra enumeratos pertinere. 2. Unam eandemque esse V. & N. canonis rationem, quam nulla obliteret antiquitas aut variet novitas. Hinc distinctio pontificiorum inter canonem Hebraeorum & Christianorum quantum ad V.T. nulla est, ut & duplicatio Hebraei canonis, ut unus sit Hebraeorum vatum, alter LXX. interpretum, quam habet Genebrardus praefat. Chronol. ad Arnoldum Pontanum. Errat quoque Stapletonus, lib. 9. princ. Doctr. cap. 6. afferens quosdam libros non canonicos posse fieri canonicos, qui scilicet scripti fuerint tempore Apostolorum. Et Tannerus lib. 1. disp. ad p. 1. Thomae disp. 5. de verbo scripto & non scripto th. 37. Non, inquiens, omnino improbabile est, quod quidam dicunt, posse Ecclesiam etiamnum librum aliquem de novo in canonem recipere. Quibus Bellar. recte contradicit, lib. 1. de verbo Dei cap. 10. Fatemur, inquiens, ecclesiam NULLO MODO posse facere librum canonicum de non canonico: sed tantum declarare quis sit habendus pro canonico.