Tertullian, Against Marcion 24
He also adduces the other seventy apostles alongside the twelve. Why would the twelve correspond to the seventy-two springs in Elim, if not the seventy to the seventy palm trees? The antithesis created a great diversity of causes, not of powers; but whoever ignored the difference in causes easily concluded it was a difference in powers. 'The Creator brought the departure of the sons of Israel out of Egypt, loaded even with the spoils of golden and silver vessels and garments, in addition to the burdens of sprinkled dough' (Exodus 12:35–36), 'but Christ prescribed that the disciples should not even carry a staff on the journey' (Luke 9:3). The former were led into solitude; the latter were sent into cities. Consider the circumstances, and you will see it is one and the same power, which arranged the expedition of its own according to scarcity and abundance—so that it would abound through cities, having been circumcised, just as it was led through solitude. He also forbade them to carry sandals; for he was the one under whom the people did not wear out their sandals in the wilderness for so many years (Deuteronomy 29:5). 'You will greet no one on the road' (Luke 10:4). O Christ, destroyer of the prophets, from whom he received this very command! When Elisha sent his servant Gehazi on the road to the Shunammite's son to raise him from death, I think he commanded him thus: 'Gird your loins, take my staff in your hand, and go. Whomever you meet on the road, do not bless him—that is, do not greet him—and whoever blesses you, do not answer him—that is, do not return the greeting' (2 Kings 4:29). What is a blessing on the road except a mutual greeting upon meeting? So also the Lord's command: 'Into whatever house you enter, first say, "Peace to this house"' (Luke 10:5) follows the same pattern. For Elisha also commanded: 'When you enter the Shunammite's house, say to her, "Peace to your husband, peace to your son"' (2 Kings 4:29). These will be our antitheses—antitheses that compare, not separate, Christ. Who will pronounce a worker worthy of his wage more authoritatively than God the judge? For to judge is itself to make the worker worthy of his wage. No retribution exists without judgment. Even now the law of the Creator is sealed, judging even working oxen worthy of their wage: 'You shall not muzzle the ox that treads out the grain' (Deuteronomy 25:4). Who is so generous to humans, unless it is the one who is also generous to beasts? If Christ also pronounces workers worthy of their wage, he has vindicated the Creator's command about taking the gold and silver vessels of the Egyptians. Those Egyptians had worked the estates and cities for Israel; they were indeed worthy workers, not driven to fraud but to compensation they could not otherwise extract from their rulers (Exodus 3:21–22). The kingdom of God is neither new nor unheard of, which he confirmed by commanding it to be announced as having drawn near. What was once far off can be said to have drawn near. But if it was never far off before it drew near, it could not be said to have drawn near, because it was never far off. Everything new and unknown is sudden. Everything sudden, when announced, then for the first time takes on an appearance and then for the first time receives its time. Moreover, it could not have delayed before it was announced, nor, from the moment it began to be announced, did it draw near. He also adds that they should say to those who did not receive them: 'Know that the kingdom of God has drawn near' (Luke 10:11). If he does not command this also for the sake of a threat, he commands it in vain. What does it matter to them if the kingdom draws near, unless it draws near with judgment? Surely for the salvation of those who received its announcement. How, if a threat cannot exist without execution, do you have God the executor in the threatener and the judge in both? So also he commands them to shake off the dust against them as a testimony of the rejection even of their land, let alone the rest of their communion (Luke 10:11). For if inhumanity and inhospitality bring no vengeance from him, to what does he send a testimony—one that portends threats? Furthermore, when the Creator also prohibits Ammonites and Moabites from being admitted into the assembly in Deuteronomy, because they treated the people departing from Egypt inhumanely and inhospitably, defrauding them of supplies (Deuteronomy 23:3–4), therefore it will stand established that the ban on communion comes from Christ, where it has its form. 'He who rejects you rejects me' (Luke 10:16). The Creator said this to Moses as well: 'They have not rejected you, but me' (Numbers 16:30 LXX / 1 Samuel 8:7). For Moses is as much an apostle as the prophets are apostles. The authority of both offices had to be equal from one and the same Lord of apostles and prophets. Who now will give the power to tread on serpents and scorpions? The Lord of all animals, or not even the God of one lizard? But it is well that the Creator also promised this power to little children through Isaiah: to put a hand into the den of asps and the nest of adders without being harmed at all (Isaiah 11:8). And we certainly know—preserving the simplicity of Scripture, for not even the beasts can harm where there is faith—that scorpions and serpents figuratively portend spiritual evils, whose prince is also designated by the Creator under the name of serpent, dragon, and every prominent beast. He gave this power to his prior Christ, as the ninetieth psalm says to him: 'You will tread on the asp and the basilisk; you will trample the lion and the dragon' (Psalms 91:13), just as Isaiah also says: 'On that day the Lord God will bring his holy, great, and strong sword, namely Christ, against that great and tortuous serpent, and he will kill it on that day' (Isaiah 27:1). But also when the same prophet says: 'A pure and holy way will be called, and the unclean will not pass through it, and there will be no unclean way in it; those who are dispersed will go in it and will not err, and there will be no lion, nor any of the worst beasts that will ascend into it, nor will it be found in it' (Isaiah 35:8–9), since 'way' demonstrates faith, through which we come to God, then already to this way—that is, to faith—he promises this evacuation and subjection of beasts. Finally, you will also find that the times of the promise agree, if you read what precedes: 'Be strong, you with hands diminished and knees relaxed; then the eyes of the blind will be opened and the ears of the deaf will hear; then the lame will leap like a deer and the tongue of the mute will be clear' (Isaiah 35:3–6). Therefore, where he has bestowed the benefits of medicines, then also he has subjected scorpions and serpents to his saints—namely, he who received this power first from the Father, that he might also bestow it on others, and exhibited it according to the order of preaching.
Latin
Adlegit et alios septuaginta apostolos super duodecim. quo enim duodecim secundum totidem fontes in Elim, si non et septuaginta secundum totidem arbusta palmarum? Antithesis plurimum causarum diuersitas fecit, non potestatum. sed qui diuersitatem causarum non respexit, facile eam potestatum existimauit. \'profectionem filiorum Israhelis creator etiam illis spoliis aureorum et argenteorum uasculorum et uestium praeter oneribus consparsionum offarcinatam educit ex Aegypto, Christus autem nec uirgam discipulis in uiam ferre praescripsit'). illi enim in solitudinem promouebantur, hi autem in ciuitates mittebantur. considera causarum offerentiam, et intelleges unam et eandem potestatem, quae secundum penuriam et copiam expeditionem suorum disposuit, proinde per ciuitates abundaturam circumcidens, sicut et egituram per solitudinem struxerat. etiam calciamenta portare uetuit illos. ipse enim erat, sub quo nec in solitudine per tot annos populus calciamenta detriuerat. neminem, inquit, in uia salutaueritis. o Christum destructorem prophetarum, a quibus hoc quoque accepit! Heliseus, cum Gezin puerum suum mitteret in uiam ad filium Sunamitidis resuscitandum de morte, puto, sic ei praecepit: accinge lumbos tuos et sume bacillum meum in manum et uade: quemcumque conueneris in uia, ne benedixeris eum, id est ne salutaueris, et qui te benedixerit, ne responderis ei, id est ne resalutaueris. quae est enim inter uias benedictio nisi ex occursu mutua salutatio? sic et domini istud: in quam introissent domum, pacem ei dicere(ut, de) exemplo eodem est. mandauit enim et hoc Heliseus: cum introisset ad Sunamitin, diceret ei: pax uiro tuo, pax filio tuo. haec erunt nostrae potius antithesis, quae comparant, non quae separant Christum. dignus autem operarius mercede sua quis magis pronuntiarit quam deus iudex? quia et hoc ipsum iudicare est, dignum facere mercede operarium. nulla retributio non ex iudicatione constitit. iam nunc et hic lex consignatur creatoris, etiam boues operantes dignos operarios mercede iudicantis: boui, inquit, terenti os non colligabis. quis tam praestans in homines nisi qui et in pecudes? quodsi et Christus dignos mercede pronuntiat operarios, excusauit praeceptum illud creatoris de uasis aureis et argenteis Aegyptiorum auferendis. qui enim uillas et urbes operati fuerant Aegyptiis, digni utique operarii mercede, non ad fraudem sunt instincti, sed ad mercedis compensationem, quam alias a dominatoribus exigere non poterant. Regnum dei neque nouum neque inauditum sic quoque confirmauit, dum illud iubet adnuntiari adpropinquasse. quod enim longe fuerit aliquando, id potest dici adpropinquasse. si autem numquam retro fuisset, antequam adpropinquasset, nec dici potuisset adpropinquasse, quod numquam longe fuisset. omne quod nouum et incognitum est, subitum est. omne quod subitum est, cum adnuntiatur, tunc primum speciem inducens tunc primum accipit tempus. ceterum nec retro tardasse potuerit, quamdiu non adnuntiabatur, nec, ex quo adnuntiari coeperit, adpropinquasse. etiam adicit, ut eis, qui illos non recepissent, dicerent: scitote tamen adpropinquasse regnum dei. si hoc non et comminationis gratia mandat, uanissime mandat. quid enim ad illos, si adpropinquaret regnum, nisi quia cum iudicio adpropinquat? in salutem scilicet eorum, qui adnuntiationem eius recepissent, ***. quo modo, si comminatio non potest sine executione, habes deum executorem in comminatore et iudicem in utroque. sic et puluerem iubet excuti in illos, in testificationem eieratae etiam terrae eorum, nedum communicationis reliquae. si enim inhumanitas et inhospitalitas nullam ab eo relaturae sunt ultionem, cui rei praemittit testificationem, minas utique portendentem ? porro cum etiam creator in Deuteronomio Ammonitas et Moabitas prohibeat recipi in ecclesiam, quod populum Aegypto profectum inhumane et inhospitaliter copiis defraudassent, ergo in Christum inde manasse constabit communicationis interdictum, ubi habet formam. qui uos spernet, me spernet. hoc et Moysi creator: non te contempserunt, sed me. tam enim apostolus Moyses quam et apostoli prophetae. aequanda erat auctoritas utriusque officii ab uno eodemque domino apostolorum et prophetarum. Quis nunc dabit potestatem calcandi super colubros et . scorpios? utrumne omnium animalium dominus an nec unius lacertae deus? sed bene, quod creator hanc potestatem etiam paruulis pueris per Esaiam repromisit, conicere manum in cauernam aspidum et in cubile natorum aspidum nec omnino laedi. et utique scimus — salua simplicitate scripturae, nam nec et ipsae bestiae nocere poterunt, ubi fides fuerit — figurate scorpios et colubros portendi spiritalia malitiae, quorum ipse quoque princeps in serpentis et draconis et eminentissimae cuiusque bestiae nomine deputetur penes creatorem, largitum hanc potestatem priori Christo suo, sicut nonagesimus psalmus ad eum: super aspidem et basiliscum incedes et conculcabis leonem et draconem, sicut etiam Esaias: illa die superducet dominus deus machaeram sanctam, magnam et fortem, Christum scilicet suum, in draconem illum, colubrum magnum et tortuosum, et interficiet eum illa die. sed et cum idem: uia munda et uia sancta uocabitur et non transibit illic inmundum nec erit illic uia inmunda; qui autem dispersi erunt uadent in ea et non errabunt, et non erit iam illic leo nec ex bestiis pessimis quicquam ascendet in eam nec inuenietur illic, cum \'uiam\' fidem demonstret, per quam ad deum perueniemus, iam tunc eidem uiae, id est fidei, hanc euacuationem et subiectionem bestiarum pollicetur. denique et tempora promissionis congruere inuenias, si quae antecedunt legas: inualescite, manus dimissae et genua resoluta: tunc patefient oculi caecorum et aures exaudient surdorum; tunc saliet claudus ut ceruus et clara erit lingua mutorum. igitur ubi medicinarum edidit beneficia, tunc et scorpios et serpentes sanctis suis subdidit, ille scilicet, qui hanc potestatem, ut et aliis praestaret, prior acceperat a patre et secundum ordinem praedicationis exhibuit.