Resurrection of the Body

Athenagoras, On the Resurrection of the Dead 14

Athenagoras · fl. c. 177 AD

The demonstration of the doctrines of truth, or of any matters brought forward for examination, produces unerring faith in what is said. Its starting point does not come from outside somewhere, nor from what certain people think or have decreed, but from the common and natural notion, or from the consequence of secondary things to primary ones. For a proof concerns either primary doctrines, in which case only a reminder is needed to stir up the natural notion, or it concerns things that follow by nature from the primary doctrines and the natural sequence. In the latter case we need an ordering of these things, showing what truly follows from the first or previously established truths, so that we neither neglect the truth or the security it gives, nor confuse or break the things that nature has ordained and defined. Therefore I think it necessary for those who are eager about the matters at hand and wish to judge wisely—whether a resurrection of human bodies occurs or not—to first examine carefully the force of the considerations that contribute to this demonstration, and the place each one occupies, and what is first, second, third, and last among them. Having arranged these, we must set first the cause of the generation of human beings, that is, the purpose of the Creator according to which he made humanity, and closely attach to it the nature of the human beings he made—not as though it were secondary in order, but because judgment cannot be passed on both at the same time, even though they coexist and supply equal force for the question. Through these considerations, as primary and having their origin in creation, the resurrection is clearly shown; and no less through the reasoning of providence can we gain faith in it—I mean through the honor or justice owed to each human being according to just judgment, and the end proper to human life. For many, taking up the account of the resurrection, have attributed the whole cause to judgment alone, supposing the resurrection happens because of judgment. This is clearly proved false by the fact that all human beings who die will rise, but not all who rise will be judged. For if the just requirement of judgment alone were the cause of the resurrection, then those who have not sinned or done any good—namely, infants who have died—would have to not rise. But since all can rise, both the rest and those who died in their first age, they themselves demonstrate that the resurrection comes about not primarily through judgment, but through the Creator's purpose and the nature of the created.

Greek

Ἡ τῶν τῆς ἀληθείας δογμάτων ἢ τῶν ὁπωσοῦν εἰς ἐξέτασιν προβαλλομένων ἀπόδειξις, τὴν ἀπλανῆ τοῖς λεγομένοις ἐπιφέρουσα πίστιν, οὐκ ἔξωθέν ποθεν ἔχει τὴν ἀρχήν, οὐδ᾿ ἐκ τῶν τισι δοκούντων ἢ δεδογμένων, ἀλλ᾿ ἐκ τῆς κοινῆς καὶ φυσικῆς ἐννοίας ἢ τῆς πρὸς τὰ πρῶτα τῶν δευτέρων ἀκολουθίας. Ἢ γὰρ περὶ τῶν πρώτων ἐστὶ δογμάτων, καὶ δεῖ μόνης ὑπομνήσεως τῆς τὴν φυσικὴν ἀνακινούσης ἔννοιαν, ἢ περὶ τῶν κατὰ φύσιν ἑπομένων τοῖς πρώτοις καὶ τῆς φυσικῆς ἀκολουθίας, καὶ δεῖ τῆς ἐπὶ τούτοις τάξεως, δεικνύντας τί τοῖς πρώτοις ἢ τοῖς προτεταγμένοις ἀκολουθεῖ κατ᾿ ἀλήθειαν, ἐπὶ τὸ μήτε τῆς ἀληθείας ἢ τῆς κατ᾿ αὐτὴν ἀσφαλείας ἀμελεῖν, μήτε τὰ τῇ φύσει τεταγμένα καὶ διωρισμένα συγχεῖν ἢ τὸν φυσικὸν εἱρμὸν διασπᾶν. Ὅθεν οἶμαι χρῆναι δίκαιον περὶ τῶν προκειμένων ἐσπουδακότας, καὶ κρίνειν ἐμφρόνως θέλοντας εἴτε γίνεται τῶν ἀνθρωπίνων σωμάτων ἀνάστασις εἴτε μή, πρῶτον μὲν ἐπισκοπεῖν καλῶς τῶν πρὸς τὴν τοῦδε δεῖξιν συντελούντων τὴν δύναμιν, καὶ ποίαν ἕκαστον εἴληχε χώραν, καὶ τί μὲν τούτων πρῶτον τί δὲ δεύτερον τί δὲ τρίτον τί δὲ ἐπὶ τούτοις ὕστατον. Ταῦτα δὲ διαταξαμένους χρὴ πρώτην μὲν τάξαι τὴν αἰτίαν τῆς τῶν ἀνθρώπων γενέσεως, τοῦτ᾿ ἔστι τὴν τοῦ δημιουργήσαντος γνώμην καθ᾿ ἣν ἐποίησεν ἄνθρωπον, ταύτῃ δὲ προσφυῶς ἐπισυνάψαι τὴν τῶν γενομένων ἀνθρώπων φύσιν, οὐχ ὡς τῇ τάξει δευτερεύουσαν, διὰ δὲ τὸ μὴ δύνασθαι κατὰ ταὐτὸν ἀμφοτέρων γενέσθαι τὴν κρίσιν, κἂν ὅτι μάλιστα συνυπάρχωσιν ἀλλήλαις καὶ πρὸς τὸ προκείμενον τὴν ἴσην παρέχωνται δύναμιν. Διὰ δὲ τούτων, ὡς πρώτων καὶ τὴν ἐκ δημιουργίας ἐχόντων ἀρχήν, ἐναργῶς δεικνυμένης τῆς ἀναστάσεως, οὐδὲν ἧττον καὶ διὰ τῶν τῆς προνοίας λόγων ἔστι λαβεῖν τὴν περὶ ταύτης πίστιν, λέγω δὲ διὰ τῆς ἑκάστῳ τῶν ἀνθρώπων ὀφειλομένης κατὰ δικαίαν κρίσιν τιμῆς ἢ δίκης καὶ τοῦ κατὰ τὸν ἀνθρώπινον βίον τέλους. Πολλοὶ γὰρ τὸν τῆς ἀναστάσεως λόγον διαλαμβάνοντες τῷ τρίτῳ μόνῳ τὴν πᾶσαν ἐπήρεισαν αἰτίαν, νομίσαντες τὴν αἰτίαν γίνεσθαι διὰ τὴν κρίσιν. Τοῦτο δὲ περιφανῶς δείκνυται ψεῦδος ἐκ τοῦ πάντας μὲν ἀνίστασθαι τοὺς ἀποθνήσκοντας ἀνθρώπους, μὴ πάντας δὲ κρίνεσθαι τοὺς ἀναστάντας· εἰ γὰρ μόνον τὸ κατὰ τὴν κρίσιν δίκαιον τῆς ἀναστάσεως ἦν αἴτιον, ἐχρῆν δήπου τοὺς μηδὲν ἡμαρτηκότας ἢ κατορθώσαντας μηδ᾿ ἀνίστασθαι, τοῦτ᾿ ἔστι τοὺς κομιδῆ νέους παῖδας· ἐξὸν δὲ πάντας ἀνίστασθαι, τούς τε ἄλλους καὶ δὴ καὶ τοὺς κατὰ τὴν πρώτην ἡλικίαν τελευτήσαντας, καὶ αὐτοὶ δικαιοῦσιν ὡς οὐ διὰ τὴν κρίσιν ἡ ἀνάστασις γίνεται κατὰ πρῶτον λόγον, ἀλλὰ διὰ τὴν τοῦ δημιουργήσαντος γνώμην καὶ τὴν τῶν δημιουργηθέντων φύσιν.

← Resurrection of the Body