Celsus recants and urges courting rulers
Celsus, I think, after all the words he spoke about demons who need the smoke of sacrifice and blood, as though turning to wickedness, sings a recantation and says that “we should rather believe that the demons need nothing and lack nothing, but take pleasure in those who act piously toward them.” If he thought this was true, he ought not to have set down those earlier words; he should have struck them out.
But human nature is not wholly abandoned by God and by the Truth, His only-begotten. That is why Celsus too spoke the truth in what he said about the smoke of sacrifice and the blood that demons crave; but again, by his own wickedness, he slid down into falsehood, and he likens the demons to men who do what is just in a perfectly just way, even if no one thanks them, and who do good to those who repay them with gratitude.
He seems to me to be confused on this subject: at one moment his ruling mind is troubled by the demons, and at another, coming back to his senses from the folly he suffers under them, he sees a little of the truth. For again he adds: “But God must not be forsaken anywhere or in any way, neither by day nor by night, neither in public nor in private, in every word and in every deed continually; indeed, both with these and apart from them, let the soul be always directed toward God.” I take “with these” to mean with public life, with every deed and with every word.
Then again, as though wrestling in his reasoning against the frenzies that come from the demons and being mostly overcome, he goes on to say: “If this is so, what is so dreadful in winning the favour of the rulers here, both the others and the princes and kings among men, since not even these have been granted their place in this world without the strength of demons?” Earlier, as far as it lay with him, he was dragging our soul down to the demons; now he wants us to win the favour of the princes and kings among men as well. Since life and the histories are full of examples of these men, I have not thought it necessary to set them out now.
Greek
Κέλσος μὲν ουν οἶμαι μετὰ τοσούτους, οὓς εἶπε περὶ δαιμόνων δεομένων κνίσσης καὶ αἵματος λόγους, ὡσπερεὶ ἐπὶ μοχθηρίαν ἐρχόμενος παλινῳδίαν φησὶν ὅτι μᾶλλον οἰητέον τοὺς δαίμονας μηδενὸς χρῄζειν μηδὲ δεῖσθαί τινος ἀλλὰ χαίρειν τοῖς τὸ εὐσεβὲς δρῶσι πρὸς αὐτούς. ἐχρῆν δ᾿, εἰ τοῦτο ᾤετο εἶναι ἀληθὲς. ἐκεῖνα αὐτὸν μὴ τεθεικέναι, ταῦτα ἀπηλειφέναι. ἀλλὰ γὰρ οὐ πάντῃ ἡ ἀνθρωπίνη φύσις ὑπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ καὶ τῆς μονογενοῦς αὐτῷ ἀληθείας καταλείπεται. διόπερ καὶ Κέλσος εἶπε μὲν ἐν τῷ περὶ κνίσσης καὶ αἵματος, ὧν χρῄζουσι δαίμονες. τἀληθῆ· πάλιν δ᾿ ὑπὸ τῆς ἰδίας κακίας κατώλισθεν ἐπὶ τὰ ψευδῆ καὶ ἐξομοιοῖ τοὺς δαίμονας ἀνθρώποις τοῖς τελέως δικαίως πράττουσι τὰ δίκαια. κἂν μηδεὶς αὐτοῖς γινώσκῃ χάριν. τὰ ἀγαθὰ δὲ ποιοῦσι τοῖς ἀμειβομένοις τὸ εὐχάριστον. δοκεῖ δέ μοι συγχεῖσθαι κατὰ τὸν τόπον καὶ ὁτὲ μὲν τὸ ἡγεμονικὸν ὑπὸ τῶν δαιμόνων ταράττεσθαι, ἔσθ᾿ ὅτε δὲ καὶ ἀνανήφων ἀπὸ τῆς ὑπ᾿ ἐκείνοις ἀλογιστίας ἐπ᾿ ὀλίγον τι βλέπειν τοῦ ἀληθοῦς. πάλιν γὰρ ἐπιφέρει· θεοῦ δὲ οὐδαμῇ οὐδαμῶς ἀπολειπτέον οὔτε μεθ᾿ ἡμέραν οὔτε νύκτωρ οὔτ᾿ ἐς κοινὸν οὔτ᾿ ἰδίᾳ λόγῳ τε ἐν παντὶ καὶ ἔργῳ διηνεκῶς. ἀλλά γε καὶ μετὰ τῶνδε καὶ χωρὶς ἡ ψυχὴ ἀεὶ τετάσθω πρὸς τὸν θεόν. ἐγὼ δ᾿ ἀκούω τοῦ μετὰ τῶνδε τουτέστι μετὰ τοῦ κοινοῦ καὶ μετὰ παντὸς ἔργου καὶ μετὰ παντὸς λόγου. εἶτα πάλιν ὡσπερεὶ παλαίων τῷ λογισμῷ πρὸς τὰς ἀπὸ τῶν δαιμόνων ἐκστάσεις καὶ τὰ πολλὰ νικώμενος ἐπιφέρει καὶ λέγει· εἰ ὧδε ἔχοιεν, τί τὸ δεινὸν τοὺς τῇδε ἄρχοντας εὐμενίζεσθαι, τούς τε ἄλλους καὶ τοὺς ἐν ἀνθρώποις δυνάστας καὶ βασιλέας, ὡς οὐδὲ τούτους ἄνευ δαιμονίας ἰσχύος τῶν τῇδε ἠξιωμένους; ἐν μὲν οὖν τοῖς ἀνωτέρω κατῆγεν ὅσον ἐφ᾿ ἑαυτῷ τὴν ψυχὴν ἡμῶν πρὸς τοὺς δαίμονας· νῦν δὲ βούλεται ἡμᾶς ἐξευμενίζεσθαι καὶ τοὺς ἐν ἀνθρώποις δυνάστας καὶ βασιλέας, ὧν ἐπεὶ μεστὸς ὁ βίος καὶ (αἱ) ἱστορίαι, νῦν οὐχ ἡγησάμην ἀναγκαῖον ἐκθέσθαι τὰ παραδείγματα.