Against Celsus, Book VII · §10 · Origen of Alexandria

Why the prophets spoke in riddles

But if he had been fair in his accusation, he ought to have set out the prophecies word for word, whether those in which the speaker announced himself to be God almighty, or those in which he announced himself the Son of God, or those in which the speaker was believed to be the Holy Spirit. For then he would have been making a real effort to overturn what was said and to show that the words were not inspired, words that contain a call to turn from sins, a rebuke of the people of that day, and foreknowledge of things to come. That is why those who lived in the prophets’ own time wrote down their prophecies and preserved them: so that later generations too, reading them, might marvel at them as words of God; and, helped not only by the rebukes and calls to conversion but also by the predictions, and convinced by the outcome of events that it was a divine Spirit who had foretold them, might persevere in practising the piety that accords with the word, obeying the law and the prophets.

The prophets, then, in accordance with the will of God, spoke without any concealment whatever their hearers could usefully understand at once and whatever helped to correct their conduct. But what was more mystical, more for the eyes of the initiated, and bound up with a contemplation beyond what the common ear can take in, they set forth “through riddles” (Numbers 12:8), through allegories, through what are called dark sayings, and through what are named parables or proverbs (Proverbs 1:6). They did this so that those who do not shrink from toil, but take on every labour for the sake of virtue and truth, might examine and find, and, having found, might put what they found to use as reason requires.

But the noble Celsus, as though angry at not having understood such words of the prophets, reviled them, saying: “Having brandished all this, they go on to add unintelligible, frenzied and altogether obscure words, whose meaning no one with any sense could discover; for they are unclear and mean nothing, but they give any fool or sorcerer an opening to seize on what was said and make it his own, on any matter and in whatever way he wishes.” He seems to me to have said this with cunning, wishing, so far as lay in his power, to keep readers of the prophecies from testing and examining their meaning. And something has happened to him like what happened to those who said of a certain prophet, who had gone in to someone and foretold the future to him: “Why did this madman come in to you?” (2 Kings 9:11).

Greek

Ἐχρῆν δὲ αὐτὸν, εἴπερ εὐγνωμόνει πρὸς τὴν κατηγορίαν, ἐκθέσθαι αὐταῖς λέξεσι τὰς προφητείας, εἴτ᾿ ἐν αἷς θεὸς παντοκράτωρ ἐπηγγέλλετο εἶναι ὁ λέγων, εἴτ᾿ ἐν αἷς ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ, εἴτε καὶ ἐν αἷς τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον λέγον εἶναι ἐπιστεύετο· οὕτω γὰρ καὶ ἠγωνίασεν ἀνασκευάσαι τὰ εἰρημένα καὶ δεῖξαι ὅτι οὐκ ἔνθεοι ἦσαν οἱ λόγοι, περιέχοντες ἐπιστροφὴν ἀπὸ τῶν ἁμαρτημάτων καὶ ἔλεγχον τῶν ποτε ὄντων καὶ πρόγνωσιν περὶ τῶν μελλόντων. διὸ καὶ οἱ κατ᾿ αὐτοὺς ἀπογραψάμενοι τὰς προφητείας αὐτῶν ἐφύλαξαν, ἵνα καὶ οἱ μεταγενέστεροι ἀναγινώσκοντες θαυμάζωσιν ὡς λόγους θεοῦ καὶ ὠφελούμενοι οὐ μόνον ἀπὸ τῶν ἐπιπληκτικῶν καὶ ἐπιστρεπτικῶν ἀλλὰ καὶ ἀπὸ τῶν προγνωστικῶν ταῖς ἐκβάσεσι πειθόμενοι περὶ τοῦ θεῖον εἶναι πνεῦμα τὸ προειρηκὸς τὴν κατὰ τὸν λόγον εὐσέβειαν ἀσκοῦντες διατελῶσι, πειθόμενοι τῷ νόμῳ καὶ τοῖς προφήταις. οἱ μὲν ουν προφῆται ὅσα ἦν αὐτόθεν νοηθῆναι τοῖς ἀκούουσι χρήσιμα καὶ συμβαλλόμενα τῇ τῶν ἠθῶν ἐπανορθώσει χωρὶς πάσης ἐπικρύψεως κατὰ τὸ βούλημα τοῦ θεοῦ εἰρήκασιν, ὅσα δὲ μυστικώτερα ἦν καὶ ἐποπτικώτερα καὶ ἐχόμενα θεωρίας τῆς ὑπὲρ τὴν πάνδημον ἀκοὴν, ταῦτα „δι᾿ αἰνιγμάτων“ καὶ ἀλληγοριῶν καὶ τῶν καλουμένων σκοτεινῶν λόγων καὶ τῶν ὀνομαζομένων παραβολῶν ἢ παροιμιῶν ἀπεφήναντο· ἵν᾿ οἱ μὴ φυγοπονοῦντες ἀλλὰ πάντα πόνον ὑπὲρ ἀρετῆς καὶ ἀληθείας ἀναδεχόμενοι ἐξετάσαντες εὕρωσι καὶ εὑρόντες, ὡς λόγος αἱρεῖ, οἰκονομήσωσιν. ὁ δὲ γεννάδας Κέλσος ὡσπερεὶ θυμωθεὶς ἐπὶ τῷ μὴ νενοηκέναι τοὺς τῶν προφητῶν τοιούτους λόγους ἐλοιδόρησεν αὐτοὺς, εἰπὼν ὅτι ταῦτα ἐπανατεινάμενοι προστιθέασιν ἐφεξῆς ἄγνωστα καὶ πάροιστρα καὶ πάντῃ ἄδηλα, ὧν τὸ μὲν γνῶμα οὐδεὶς ἂν νοῦν ἔχων εὑρεῖν δύναιτο· ἀσαφῆ γὰρ καὶ τὸ μηδὲν, ἀνοήτῳ δὲ ἢ γόητι παντὶ περὶ παντὸς ἀφορμὴν ἐνδίδωσιν, ὅπῃ βούλεται, τὸ λεχθὲν σφετερίζεσθαι. καὶ πανούργως μοι ἔδοξε ταῦτ᾿ εἰρηκέναι, κωλύειν τὸ ὅσον ἐφ᾿ ἑαυτῷ βουλόμενος τοὺς ἐντυγχάνοντας ταῖς προφητείαις βασανίζειν καὶ ἐξετάζειν αὐτῶν τὸν νοῦν· καὶ πέπονθέ τι πρᾶγμα παραπλήσιον τοῖς εἰποῦσι περί τινος προφήτου, εἰσελθόντος πρός τινα καὶ τὰ μέλλοντα προειπόντος αὐτῷ· „τί εἰσῆλθεν ὁ ἐπίληπτος οὗτος πρός σε;“

Report a mistake in this passage