Against Celsus, Book VI · §30 · Origen of Alexandria

The seven archons of the Ophite diagram

Next he takes up again what he said about the seven ruling demons, who are never named by Christians but are, I think, accepted by the Ophites. And indeed, in the diagram that we ourselves obtained because of them, we found the order set out just as Celsus set it out. Celsus said that the first is formed in the shape of a lion, without stating what name these truly most impious people give him. But we found that that foul diagram said the lion-shaped one was Michael, the angel of the Creator who is honoured in the holy Scriptures. Again, Celsus said that the next one, the second, is a bull; the diagram we had said that Suriel is the bull-shaped one. Then Celsus spoke of a third, an amphibious creature that hisses horribly; the diagram said that the third is Raphael, the serpent-shaped. Again, Celsus said that the fourth has the form of an eagle; the diagram said that Gabriel is the eagle-shaped one. Then Celsus said that the fifth has the face of a bear; the diagram said that Thauthabaoth is the bear-shaped one. Then Celsus said that among them the sixth is described as having the face of a dog; the diagram said that he is Erathaoth. Then Celsus said that the seventh has the face of an ass and is named Thaphabaoth or Onoel; but we found in the diagram that he is called Onoel or Thartharaoth, and that he has the shape of an ass.

We too decided to set out such things exactly, so that we may not seem ignorant of what Celsus professed to know, and also so that we Christians may show that we know these things more exactly than he does, and know them as the words not of Christians but of people wholly estranged from salvation, who in no way call themselves by the name of Jesus, or of Saviour, or God, or Teacher, or Son of God.

Greek

Εἶθ᾿ ἑξῆς ἐπαναλαμβάνει τὰ περὶ τῶν ἑπτὰ ἀρχόντων δαιμόνων, μηδαμῶς μὲν ὑπὸ Χριστιανῶν ὀνομαζομένων οἶμαι δ᾿ ὑπὸ Ὀφιανῶν παραλαμβανομένων. καὶ εὕρομέν γε ἐν ᾧ καὶ ἡμεῖς δι᾿ ἐκείνους ἐκτησάμεθα διαγράμματι τὴν τάξιν ὁμοίως ἐκκειμένην οἷς ὁ Κέλσος ἐξέθετο. ὁ μὲν οὖν Κέλσος ἔλεγε τὸν πρῶτον ἰδέᾳ λέοντος μεμορφωμένον, οὐκ ἐκθέμενος, τίνα αὐτὸν ὀνομάζουσιν οἱ ἀληθῶς δυσσεβέστατοι· ἡμεῖς δὲ εὕρομεν ὅτι τὸν ἐν ταῖς ἱεραῖς γραφαῖς εὐφημούμενον ἄγγελον τοῦ δημιουργοῦ, τοῦτον τὸ μιαρὸν ἐκεῖνο διάγραμμα ἔλεγεν εἶναι Μιχαὴλ τὸν λεοντοειδῆ. πάλιν τ᾿ αὖ μὲν Κέλσος ἔφασκε τὸν ἑξῆς καὶ δεύτερον εἶναι ταῦρον· ὃ δ᾿ εἴχομεν διάγραμμα τὸν Σουριὴλ ἔλεγεν εἶναι τὸν ταυροειδῆ. εἶτα ὁ μὲν Κέλσος τρίτον ἀμφίβιόν τινα καὶ φρικῶδες ἐπισυρίζοντα· τὸ δὲ διάγραμμα τρίτον Ῥαφαὴλ ἔλεγεν εἶναι δρακοντοειδῆ. πάλιν τε αὖ ὁ μὲν Κέλσος τὸν τέταρτον ἀετοῦ ἔφασκεν ἔχειν μορφήν· τὸ δὲ διάγραμμα Γαβριὴλ ἔλεγεν εἶναι τὸν ἀετοειδῆ. εἶθ᾿ μὲν Κέλσος τὸν πέμπτον ἔφασκεν εἶναι ἄρκου πρόσωπον ἔχοντα· τὸ δὲ διάγραμμα τὸν Θαυθαβαὼθ ἔφασκεν εἶναι τὸν ἀρκοειδῆ. εἶθ᾿ ὁ μὲν Κέλσος τὸν ἕκτον κυνὸς πρόσωπον ἔλεγεν ἱστορεῖσθαι ἔχειν παρ᾿ ἐκείνοις· τὸ δὲ διάγραμμα ἔφασκεν εἶναι αὐτὸν Ἐραθαώθ. εἶθ᾿ ὁ μὲν Κέλσος τὸν ἕβδομον ἔφασκεν ὄνου ἔχειν πρόσωπον, καὶ ὀνομάζεσθαι αὐτὸν Θαφαβαὼθ ἢ Ὀνοήλ· ἡμεῖς δ᾿ ἐν τῷ διαγράμματι εὕρομεν ὅτι οὗτος καλεῖται Ὀνοὴλ ἢ Θαρθαραὼθ, ὀνοειδής τις τυγχάνων. ἔδοξε δὲ καὶ ἡμῖν ἀκριβῶς ἐκθέσθαι τὰ τοιαῦτα, ἵνα μὴ δοκῶμεν ἀγνοεῖν ἃ Κέλσος ἐπηγγέλλετο εἰδέναι· ἀλλὰ καὶ παραστήσωμεν ἀκριβέστερον ἐκείνου αὐτὰ ἐγνωκότες οἱ Χριστιανοὶ, ὡς οὐ Χριστιανῶν λόγους ἀλλὰ πάντῃ ἀλλοτρίων σωτηρίας καὶ οὐδαμῶς ἐπιγραφομένων Ἰησοῦν ἢ σωτῆρα ἢ θεὸν ἢ διδάσκαλον ἢ υἱὸν θεοῦ.

Report a mistake in this passage