The second of the five propositions is not Jansenius's
Thesis IX. This shows that Jansenius is wrongly credited with the proposition: 'In the state of fallen nature, inward grace is never resisted.' Yet this is the second of the five notorious propositions that the Roman pontiffs Innocent X and Alexander VII condemned as heretical, as being those of Jansenius, bishop of Ypres, in constitutions they issued on the matter.
Apart from the fact that the wording of this proposition appears nowhere in his works, he plainly teaches the opposite in the passage just quoted, where he states outright that many people are, by God's doing, given light in their minds and even stirred in their wills by movements of divine grace, and yet refuse consent to its inward persuasion and leaning.
Latin
IX. Ex quibus apparet falso Jansenio tribui propositionem illam, Interiori gratiae in statu naturae lapsae nunquam resistitur. Quae tamen secunda est quinque famosarum propositionum, quae tanquam Jansenii Episcopi Iprensis, ut haereticae damnatae sunt a Pontificibus Romanis Innocentio X. & Alexandro VII. constitutionibus ea de re editis. Praeterquam enim quod ejus propositionis verba in operibus viri illius nullibi leguntur, contrarium expresse docet loco modo citato, ubi diserte affirmat quod constet multos divinitus mente collustrari, imo vero & in ipsa voluntate motibus divinae gratiae percelli, qui tamen ab ejus interna suasione & inclinatione dissentiunt.