Cameron: love for the gifts is human; God's love makes the gifts
Thesis XI. Cameron says much the same in the digression on grace mentioned above. It must be noted, he writes, that God's gifts are never called grace in the sense that they win God's favour, as if those gifts made us pleasing and acceptable to God.
If God's gifts are ever called grace in that sense, the reference is to human beings, who are drawn to love by such gifts, and not to God. To see this, one must understand that human love won by these gifts does not make the gifts but finds them. Divine love both found and made them, like a painter who delights in his work: he takes joy in its beauty and was also the one who produced that beauty.
So, strictly speaking, no grace should have been called grace that makes pleasing. It should rather have been called the grace of the one who makes pleasing.
Latin
XI. Et similiter Camero in jam supra memorata digressione de gratia, Caeterum, inquit, observandum est dona Dei nunquam dici hoc sensu gratiam, quasi iis conciliaretur Dei favor, eaque dona nos redderent Deo gratos & acceptos. Sed si quando dona Dei dicuntur gratia hoc sensu, hominum ratio habetur, qui istis donis inducuntur in amorem, non autem habetur ratio Dei. Quod ut percipiatur intelligendum est humanum amorem qui conciliatur istis donis, non efficere haec dona, sed invenire. At amor divinus idem invenit & effecit haec dona: ut pictor qui delectatur opere suo, idem gaudet pulchritudine operis, & autor fuit istius pulchritudinis. Itaque nulla debuit dici gratia gratum faciens proprie loquendo, sed potius dicenda fuit illa gratia gratum facientis.