On their view rousing grace imposes no necessity either
Thesis LXVI. On their view, then, assisting grace taken strictly and as such does not move a person to act, but helps him in the actual working.
Rousing grace, though it does move a person to act, does not lay on him any necessity of acting. It leaves him his own part to play, namely to determine himself to the devout work, since otherwise he can refrain from it, if he wishes, and determine himself differently.
So it too should not be called the total or adequate cause of the good work, as may be seen in the same Peter of Saint Joseph at the place cited above.
Latin
LXVI. Itaque ex eorum mente, gratia adjuvans ut sic & praecise considerata, non movet hominem ad agendum, sed illum juvat in actuali operatione. Gratia excitans vero, etsi hominem moveat ad agendum, non tamen illi imponit agendi necessitatem; sed illi suas partes relinquit, ut se nimirum determinet ad opus pium, cum alioqui possit ab eo abstinere, si velit, & aliter se determinare. Unde nec illa dici debet causa totalis, sive adaequata bonae operationis, ut videre est apud eundem Petrum a sancto Joseph loco supra citato.