Amyraut: this necessity does not harm freedom, which is not indifference; only physical force or the loss of deliberation does
Nor does he think that this necessity or determination, which on his view arises from the fit between object and faculty, hinders freedom at all, since he does not place freedom in the free faculty's indetermination, indifference and immunity from all necessity.
He thinks freedom conflicts only with the necessity that comes from external force, from matter or from sense, which we may call physical and brute necessity, or at least with the necessity that removes all consultation and deliberation.
Latin
XIX. Nec istam necessitatem seu determinationem, quae juxta ipsum oritur a convenientia objecti cum facultate, libertati quicquam officere putat, quoniam libertatem non constituit in facultatis liberae indeterminatione & indifferentia & immunitate ab omni necessitate, sed cum ea pugnare putat eam solum necessitatem quae est a vi externa, a materia, vel a sensu, quam Physicam & brutam appellare possumus, aut saltem eam quae tollit omnem consultationem & deliberationem.