So there is no reason to deny God this knowledge without a predetermining decree; the objections strike absolute foreknowledge too
I therefore see no reason to deny God knowledge of what would freely happen under a certain condition, even though the condition does not include a decree predetermining the free cause to this or that.
If any arguments seem to overthrow that knowledge, for instance that it cannot be grasped how God infallibly knows something to be future that could fail to be, those arguments also conflict with the foreknowledge of contingents that are absolutely future, and God's word puts it beyond all doubt that God has that foreknowledge.
Latin
LXIII. Nihil ergo video cur negemus Deo scientiam eorum quae libere futura essent sub certa conditione, quanquam in conditione ista non includatur decretum de causa libera ad hoc vel illud praedeterminanda. Et si quae argumenta scientiam istam videntur evertere, ut quod capi non potest qua ratione Deus infallibiliter cognoscat futurum esse quod posset non esse, pugnant illa quoque cum praescientia contingentium quae sunt absolute futura; quam tamen in Deo dari verbum Dei ponit extra omne dubium.