Jansenius grants wayfarers indifference but makes it a sign of freedom, not its cause
That teacher will not have it belong to the proper essence of freedom that the will stand indifferently toward its acts, able to act or not act, to do this or even its opposite.
Yet with the old scholastics he openly admits that such indifference is present in the will of people still on their earthly way. Their freedom is exempt not only from compulsion but also from unchangeable voluntary necessity; it is open to either side.
What he denies is only that the general freedom of human choice consists in that indifference. The indifference is indeed a most certain sign of freedom in a rational creature, but it is not the cause or ground of freedom. It can therefore be present or absent at the will's discretion without any loss of freedom. (On the Grace of Christ the Saviour, book 6, chapter 34.)
Latin
XXXIV. Caeterum quanquam Doctor ille ad propriam libertatis essentiam pertinere nolit ut voluntas ad suos actus indifferenter se habeat, ita nempe ut possit agere, & non agere, hoc vel etiam contrarium agere; tamen cum veteribus Scholasticis aperte fatetur talem indifferentiam hominum viatorum voluntati adesse; eorum enim libertatem non solum expertem esse coactionis, sed etiam necessitatis immutabilis voluntariae, hoc est, eam ad utrumque indifferentem esse. Id solum negat in illa indifferentia sitam esse generalem humani arbitrii libertatem. Quippe hanc indifferentiam certissimum quidem esse in creatura rationali libertatis indicium, non tamen libertatis esse causam, vel rationem. Et propterea adesse vel abesse posse voluntatis arbitrio, sine dispendio libertatis. De Gratia Chr. Salvat. lib. 6. cap. 34.