So it is inconsistent to say righteousness was natural yet Adam needed supernatural help to act; God's constant help can be of the natural order
So it also seems not quite reasonable for some of the Reformed cited above to say that, although the righteousness and holiness in which the first man was created were natural to him, he still needed a supernatural help to move and stir him to do good.
It is certain that without God's constant help man never does any good, not only in spiritual matters but not even in civil and human ones, so that even before the fall man needed the continual help of God, in whom we live and move and have our being. But that help did not have to be of the supernatural order. Help that did not go beyond the order of nature as God first established it could have been enough. The help a creature not yet corrupted and spoiled needs in order to act in keeping with its nature and tend toward its natural end should be reckoned as belonging to the order of nature.
Latin
LVI. Unde videtur quoque cum ratione non satis congruere quod ex Reformatis nonnulli supra citati dicunt, licet justitia & sanctitas illa in qua primus homo creatus est, fuerit ei naturalis, illum tamen eguisse auxilio quodam supernaturali, quo ad bene agendum moveretur & excitaretur. Quanquam enim certum sit sine jugi Dei auxilio nihil boni unquam hominem agere, non tantum in rebus spiritualibus, sed ne quidem in rebus civilibus & humanis: adeoque ante lapsum ipsum opus fuisse homini perpetuo auxilio Dei, in quo vivimus, movemur, & sumus: Attamen non necesse est ut auxilium istud fuerit Ordinis supernaturalis; sed potuit ad hoc sufficere auxilium quod non superaret ordinem naturae primitus a Deo institutae. Nam auxilium requisitum ad hoc ut creatura quaeque nondum corrupta atque vitiata, naturae suae conformiter agat, & ad finem suum naturalem tendat, ad naturae ordinem pertinere existimandum est.