So man in pure nature would lack any ordering to the vision of God, faith and charity, and the fight of flesh and spirit would be natural
So when they teach that God could create man in a state of pure nature with no prior sin at all, they mean that man would then be created without any ordering to eternal blessedness, that is, to the clear vision of God, and so would be made without faith in his intellect and without charity loving God.
They mean too that the conflict of flesh and spirit we experience would be wholly natural to such a man. The merely natural order would even require God to let those two opposed appetites clash back and forth, neither withdrawing his concurrence nor checking their mutual conflict and hostility by any added gift.
Latin
XX. Itaque quum docent hominem a Deo creari posse, nullo omnino praecedente peccato, in statu naturae purae, id sibi volunt hominem eo casu creandum esse sine ordinatione ad beatitudinem sempiternam, seu claram visionem Dei, & consequenter sine fide in intellectu, & sine charitate Deum diligente condendum. Praeterea repugnantiam illam carnis & spiritus, quam in nobis experimur, tali homini fore prorsus naturalem. Usque adeo ut ordo mere naturalis postulet, ut Deus duos illos appetitus contrarios reciprocis motibus conflictari sinat, neque concursum suum subtrahendo, neque dono quopiam superaddito mutuam pugnam hostilitatemque comprimendo.