If relative latria is lawful, why not relative sacrifice? The Fathers reserved prayer and hymns too
Besides, if on the premises of the teachers of the Roman school it is lawful to worship creatures even with latria, provided it is relative and not absolute, no solid reason can be given why it should not be lawful to sacrifice to them relatively as well.
If it is good and pious to make vows to the angels and saints who reign with Christ and to swear by them, because God dwells in them by glory, divine truth shines out in them, and they are in a sense gods by participation, why should it be impious and forbidden to offer them sacrifices on that same ground and in that same respect?
Nor did the ancient teachers of the Church reserve only sacrifices for the divine worship that may not be given to creatures. As we saw above, they reserved prayers and hymns as well, which they hold are to be addressed to God alone, the Lord of all.
Latin
LXXVIII. Adde quod, si juxta Doctorum Scholae Romanae hypotheses, licet creaturas etiam Latria, modo non absoluta, sed relativa colere, nulla solida ratio reddi potest, cur ipsis relative sacrificare non liceat. Et si bonum & pium est, Angelis & Sanctis cum Christo regnantibus vota nuncupare, & per eos jurare, quatenus illis Deus per gloriam inhabitat, & divina veritas in iis elucet, ac sunt Dii quidam per participationem, cur impium & prohibitum sit, eo nomine & respectu, sacrificia iisdem offerre. Neque etiam prisci Ecclesiae doctores sola sacrificia divino illi cultui, quem creaturis deferre nefas est, reservarunt, sed ut supra vidimus, preces quoque & hymnos, quos in solum Deum universorum Dominum dici volunt.