To Florus · §6.39

To Florus 6.39

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

‘But someone will say: How do the dead rise? In what body do they come? Fool, what you sow is not made alive unless it first dies. Not all flesh is the same: human flesh is one kind, animals’ (Daniel 12:2) another; birds’ flesh one kind, fish another. There are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies, but the glory of heavenly bodies differs from the glory of earthly bodies. The sun has one glory, the moon another, and the stars another, for star differs from star in glory. So also is the resurrection of the dead.

‘It is sown in corruption, it will rise in incorruption; sown in dishonor, it will rise in glory; sown in weakness, it will rise in power; sown an animate body, it will rise a spiritual body. Thus it is also written: The first human, Adam, became a living soul; the last Adam a life-giving spirit. The first human is from earth, earthly; the second human from heaven, heavenly. As the earthly one is, so are earthly people; as the heavenly one is, so are heavenly people. As we have borne the earthly one’s image, let us also bear the heavenly one’s image’ (1 Corinthians 15:35–49).

He masters the difficulty through examples, saying that nothing is impossible when omnipotence promises the result. Just as he commends bodily resurrection through comparison with seeds, he explains differences among those rising through the variety of creatures. Yet throughout he speaks of the blessed’s resurrection. ‘It is sown in dishonor, it will rise in glory; sown in weakness, it will rise in power; sown an animate body, it will rise a spiritual body.’ This can certainly be fulfilled only in the saints. The ungodly are raised not into glory but into everlasting disgrace, as the prophet declares (compare Jeremiah 23:40; Daniel 12:2).

Here he appropriately distinguishes nature and grace, recalling the old testimony: ‘The first human, Adam, became a living soul’ (Genesis 2:7), then adding in his own words, ‘The last Adam a life-giving spirit.’ He shows that immortality’s gifts belong to the life-giving spirit, while a soul that merely lives belongs to a nature that will one day die. Living, then, he says, is not the same as life-giving. The life-giving one bestows immortality, which he assigns to Christ; the living one enjoys life but does not exclude mortality. He distinguished the two statements for this purpose: to show Adam was made living, but not immortal, while Christ became a spirit not merely living but bestowing resurrection—glorious for his own people, everlasting for everyone.

Latin source witness

Latin

Sed dicet aliquis: Quomodo resurgunt mortui? Quo autem in corpore veniunt? Insipiens, tu quod seminas non vivificatur, nisi prius moriatur. Non omnis caro eadem caro; alia quidem hominis, alia pecoris; alia caro volatilium, alia autem piscium; et corpora caelestia et terrestria; sed alia quidem caelestium claritas, alia vero terrestrium; alia claritas solis, et alia claritas lunae, et alia claritas stellarum; stella enim a stella differt in gloria; ita et resurrectio mortuorum. Seminatur in corruptione, surget in incorruptela; seminatur in ignominia, surget in gloria; seminatur in infirmitate, surget in virtute; seminatur corpus animale, surget corpus spiritale. Sic etiam scriptum est: Factus est homo primus Adam in animam viventem, novissimus Adam in spiritum vivificantem. Primus homo de terra, terrestris; secundus homo de caelo, caelestis; qualis terrestris, tales et terreni; et qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes. Sicut portavimus imaginem terrestris, portemus etiam imaginem illius caelestis [n232] . Difficultatem rei exemplis edomat, et dicit nihil esse impossibile, cum omnipotentia pollicetur effectum. Sed sicut resurrectionem corporum seminum collatione commendat, ita etiam resurgentium diversitatem creaturarum varietatibus aperit; totum tamen loquitur de resurrectione beatorum. Seminatur - inquit - in ignominia, surget in gloria; seminatur in infirmitate, surget in virtute; seminatur corpus animale, surget corpus spiritale. Hoc certe nisi in sanctis impleri non potest; impii quoque non in gloriam excitantur, sed in opprobrium, sicut Propheta asserit, sempiternum [n233] . Hic opportune distantiam naturae atque gratiae facit, recordaturque testimonii veteris quo dictum est: Factus est homo primus Adam in animam viventem; subditque de suo: novissimus Adam in spiritum vivificantem. Ostenditque immortalitatis dona ad vivificantem spiritum pertinere; animam vero solum viventem, ad naturam quandoque morientem. Non est ergo, inquit, hoc vivens quod vivificans; vivificans est, qui confert immortalitatem, quam Christo applicat; vivens est autem, qui vita utitur, sed non excludit mortalitatem. Ergo hoc utramque sententiam fine discrevit, ut ostenderet Adam factum esse viventem, sed non immortalem; Christum autem in spiritum, non solum viventem, verum etiam conferentem resurrectionem, suis gloriosam, omnibus aeternam.

About this text

Julian’s six preserved books to Florus, quoted section by section in Augustine’s unfinished reply. Augustine’s refutations are omitted. Latin of Julian’s words is on each section.

Julian’s own books do not survive as a separate manuscript. English follows his words as Augustine quotes them in the Unfinished Work Against Julian. Augustine’s replies are omitted. We do not restore a Julian text independent of Augustine.

Witnesses

  • Copy-text Augustine, Unfinished Work Against Julian (Latin · Julian’s words as quoted, Books 1–6)
  • Checked print Augustinus.it Latin of the Unfinished Work (Latin · Same work)
  • Checked print Migne PL 45 (Latin · Hard cases)

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.