To Florus 2.16
But the feeble protection offered by blind opinion increases sins; it does not diminish them. This itch of miserable people who willingly make themselves sick will carry no weight against reason itself. Yet they claim that certain scriptural passages, especially the words of the apostle Paul, establish natural sin. I postponed explaining those passages until the second book, and now it is time to fulfill that promise. First, to equip the reader better, I will briefly distinguish what has been done from what remains. We have shown that nothing can be proved from holy Scripture which justice cannot uphold. If God’s law contains justice in its perfect form, then its adversary, injustice, can gain no strength through that law. Consequently, authority cannot defend what reason disproves. Next we proved that God is known to us by his virtues. We must therefore confess his justice just as we confess his almighty power. If his justice is allowed to collapse, his whole majesty will begin to totter. God is just in such a way that, if he were proved unjust, he would be proved not to be God. We concluded that we worship God in the Trinity as perfectly just, and it became irrefutably clear that he cannot charge infants with someone else’s sin.
Latin
Verum imbecillum caecae opinionis patrocinium multiplicat peccata, non minuit. Hic igitur miserorum pruritus et sponte aegrescentium, nullum contra ipsam rationem valebit pondus afferre; sed quia nonnullis Scripturarum locis, et maxime apostoli Pauli sermonibus confirmari asserunt naturale peccatum, quorum expositionem in secundum volumen distuli, eiusque reddendae tempus est; breviter prius (ut fiat lector instructior), et quae sint acta, et quae sint agenda distinguam. Ostensum est ergo, nihil posse per sanctas Scripturas probari, quod iustitia non possit tueri; quia si in lege Dei est perfecta forma iustitiae, nihil per eam adversaria eius, id est, iniustitia sinitur virtutis acquirere; ac per hoc, quod ratio arguit, non potest auctoritas vindicare. Deinde probatum est, Deum nobis notum esse virtutibus; huius ergo iustitiam ut omnipotentiam confitendam; cuius si admittatur excidium, maiestas incipiet tota nutare; quia ita Deus iustus est, ut si probaretur iustus non esse, convinceretur Deus non esse; conclusumque est, nos Deum aequissimum in Trinitate venerari; et irrefutabiliter apparuit, non posse ab eo peccatum alienum parvulis imputari.
About this text
Julian’s six preserved books to Florus, quoted section by section in Augustine’s unfinished reply. Augustine’s refutations are omitted. Latin of Julian’s words is on each section.
Julian’s own books do not survive as a separate manuscript. English follows his words as Augustine quotes them in the Unfinished Work Against Julian. Augustine’s replies are omitted. We do not restore a Julian text independent of Augustine.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Augustine, Unfinished Work Against Julian (Latin · Julian’s words as quoted, Books 1–6)
- Checked print Augustinus.it Latin of the Unfinished Work (Latin · Same work)
- Checked print Migne PL 45 (Latin · Hard cases)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.