System of Sacred Theology · §1.8.3 · Ludwig Crocius

Question II: Whether the bare letter without the Spirit's illumination leads to God — denied; first reason

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Question II. Does Scripture simply — insofar as it is grasped only as letter, is an outward testimony, and is contained in outward tablets — lead to God, convert, sanctify, and make blessed without the Holy Spirit's illumination? It is denied.

I. Because if the act of conversion, sanctification, and salvation is to be attributed to bare Scripture apart from and beyond the Holy Spirit's cooperation, it follows that even the Devil himself, and those hardened with that second hardening which Calvin, that most eminent theologian, notes at Luke chapter 11 — the hardened and blasphemous, yet thoroughly practiced in the Scriptures — would be converted, sanctified, and saved. But the consequent is absurd. Therefore so is the antecedent. The reason of the consequence is this: because the Devil and the ungodly no less than godly people possess, teach, and dispute from Scripture simply as it stands in the letters, without the Holy Spirit's cooperation (Matthew 4:6); they abound in dogmatic faith, yet tremble (James 2:19).

Latin

QUESTIO II. An Scriptura simpliciter, quatenus litera solummodo comprehensa, externum testimonium est, & externis tabulis continetur, sine illuminatione Spiritus sancti ad Deum ducat, convertat, sanctificet ac beat? Negatur. I. Quia, si nudae Scripturae, praeter & citra Spiritus sancti cooperationem, actus conversionis & sanctificationis & salutis attribuendus est, sequitur ipsum etiam Diabolum & induratione secunda, quam Calvinus, theologus summus, notat ad cap. XI. Lucae, induratos ac blasphemos, in Scripturis tamen exercitatissimos, converti, sanctificari & salvari. Atqui absurdum consequens. Ergo & antecedens. Ratio consequentiae haec est, quia Diabolus & impii non minus, quam pii homines, Scripturam simpliciter & in literis permanentem, sine Spiritus sancti cooperatione, possident, docent & ex iis disputant, Matth. 4.6. dogmatica fide pollent, sed contremiscunt, Jac. 2.19.

Report a mistake in this passage