← All questions

Question 12 · God and the Trinity

Was Jesus created, or eternal? What was Arianism?

What the sources show

Theophilus of Antioch c. 180 · Origen of Alexandria c. 225

Second-century writers describe the Word as always within God and then "uttered" as Son when God made the world. Origen, about 225, denies outright that there was ever a time when the Son was not. 13

Arius (quoted by Athanasius) c. 320Created

Arius, a priest of Alexandria, taught about 320 that God was not always Father and that the Son was made from nothing: "there was when he was not". 4

Council of Nicaea c. 325Eternal Son

Nicaea answered in 325: begotten, not made, of one substance with the Father, and it condemned Arius's phrases word for word. 5

The answers given:
ApostolicBefore NicaeaNicaea and afterMiddle AgesReformation to today

Scroll through the centuries, or tap a dot. J K move between witnesses.

Before Nicaea

150–325
180c. AD
Word came forth

Theophilus of Antioch fl. c. 180 ADTo Autolycus 2.22

What is the voice but the Word of God, who is also his Son? Not as the poets and mythographers say, sons of gods born from intercourse, but as the truth relates: the Word, always present within God's heart. Before anything came to be he had him as counselor, being his own mind and understanding. When God wished to make what he had planned, he begot this Word, uttering him, the firstborn of all creation.

An early two-stage picture: the Word always within God, then uttered as Son for creation. Nicaea later avoided any "before" in God's begetting.

Full English of this work is being translated
205c. AD
Word came forth

Tertullian c. 155–c. 220 ADAgainst Hermogenes 3

For God is both Father and judge, yet he is not therefore always Father and judge, because he is always God. For he could not be Father before the Son, nor judge before the offence. There was, however, a time when neither the offence nor the Son existed, the one to make him judge, the other to make God Father.

Against Hermogenes, who taught eternal matter, Tertullian distinguishes God's names: God is his name of substance, and is eternal; Lord and Father are titles that began when the things they name began. This belongs to the older scheme, seen in Theophilus, in which the Word was always within God and was uttered as Son for the making of the world; it is not yet Arius's teaching that the Son was made from nothing.

Full English of this work is being translated
225c. AD
Eternal Son

Origen of Alexandria c. 185–c. 254 ADOn First Principles 1.2.9

So another power comes to be, subsisting in its own nature, as Scripture says, "a breath of the power of God" (Wisdom 7:25), drawing what it is from there. But there is no time when it was not. If anyone wants to say that it did not exist before but came into being later, let him give the reason why the Father, who made it subsist, did not do so before.

A hundred years before Arius, Origen denies the very phrase Arius would use. Survives in Rufinus's Latin, which sometimes smooths Origen.

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text
320c. AD
Created

Arius (quoted by Athanasius) c. 256–336 ADThalia, quoted in Athanasius, Against the Arians 1.5

God was not always Father; there was a time when God was alone and was not yet Father. Later he became Father. The Son was not always. For all things came to be from nothing, and all are creatures and things made; so the Word of God himself came to be from nothing, and there was when he was not, and he was not before he came to be, but he too had a beginning of being created. For, he says, God was alone, and the Word and Wisdom did not yet exist. Then, wishing to create us, he made one being and named him Word and Wisdom and Son, so that he might create us through him.

The phrases Nicaea condemned. Arius taught that the Son was created before all ages, and that the Father alone is without beginning.

Full English of this work is being translated

Nicaea to Chalcedon

325–451
325c. AD
Eternal Son

Council of NicaeaThe Creed of Nicaea, preserved in Socrates, Church History 1.8

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the substance of the Father, God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one substance with the Father ... But those who say "there was when he was not" and "before he was begotten he was not" and "he came to be from nothing" ... these the catholic Church anathematizes.

The creed of 325 with its anathema, as Eusebius sent it home to his church. The longer creed recited today is the revision of 381.

Full English of this work is being translated

Witnesses not in the library yet

These writers also matter for this question. Their texts will join the timeline above once they are translated.

  • 324
    Alexander of Alexandria, Letter to Alexander of Thessalonica

    Arius's bishop explains the controversy. Preserved in Theodoret's Church History 1.4.

How this page was made

Every early quote was read in its Greek or Latin and translated for this page by Claude (Opus 5.5) on 13 October 2026. Each line names the printed edition it was read from. A quote marked indirect does not state the answer outright; read its note. A writer's silence is never counted as an answer.