← All questions

Question 97 · Christians and the world around them

Why were Christians persecuted, and what were they accused of?

What the sources show

Athenagoras c. 177 · Tertullian c. 197 · Caecilius (pagan speaker in Minucius Felix) c. 200 · Tacitus c. 115

Rumor charged Christians with three crimes: atheism, cannibalism and incest (Athenagoras). The real offense was refusing the gods, whose anger was blamed for floods and plague: "Christians to the lion!" 2345

Emperor Trajan c. 112 · Eusebius of Caesarea c. 313The name

Trajan's rule (112) set the pattern for a century: do not hunt them, but punish the confessed name, and pardon anyone who sacrifices. Empire-wide persecutions came later, under Decius (250) and Diocletian (303). Eusebius, an eyewitness in Palestine, saw churches razed and Scriptures burned under Diocletian's edict, and records martyrs there executed for refusing to sacrifice. 167

The answers given:
ApostolicBefore NicaeaNicaea and afterMiddle AgesReformation to today

Scroll through the centuries, or tap a dot. J K move between witnesses.

Apostolic Fathers

30–150
112c. AD
The name

Emperor Trajan 53–117 ADLetter 10.97, to Pliny 10.97.1–2

They are not to be sought out. If they are reported and proved guilty, they must be punished, but in such a way that whoever denies he is a Christian and makes it plain by deed, that is, by worshiping our gods, shall obtain pardon for his repentance, however suspect he was in the past. Anonymous accusations must have no place in any charge; they are a very bad precedent and not of our age.

The policy for over a century: no hunting, but death for the confessed name. Tertullian mocked it: if they are guilty, why not seek them; if innocent, why punish them (Apology 2.8)?

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text
115c. AD
Scapegoats

TacitusAnnals 15.44.2–3

But neither human help, nor the emperor's generosity, nor appeasing the gods removed the infamy that the fire was believed to have been ordered. So, to scotch the rumor, Nero fastened the guilt on others and inflicted the most exquisite punishments on those whom the crowd called Christians, hated for their shameful acts. Christus, from whom the name comes, was executed by the procurator Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius; and the deadly superstition, checked for the moment, broke out again, not only in Judea, the origin of that evil, but also in the city, where all atrocious and shameful things from everywhere flow together and are celebrated. Therefore those who confessed were first arrested; then, on their information, a huge multitude was convicted, not so much on the charge of arson as for hatred of the human race.

Tacitus describes Nero's scapegoating of the Christians after the great fire of Rome in AD 64. He despises the Christians and calls their faith a deadly superstition, yet he is the key pagan witness both to the execution of Christus under Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius and to the conviction of Christians for hatred of the human race.

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text

Before Nicaea

150–325
177c. AD
The charges

Athenagoras fl. c. 177 ADPlea for the Christians 3.1

Three charges are brought against us: atheism, Thyestean feasts, Oedipean intercourse. If these are true, spare no class of us; punish the crimes; destroy us root and branch with our wives and children, if any Christian lives like a beast.

"Thyestean feasts" means cannibalism (a garbled picture of the Eucharist); "Oedipean intercourse" means incest (from "brothers and sisters" and the kiss of peace). "Atheism" meant refusing the gods.

Full English of this work is being translated
197c. AD
Scapegoats

Tertullian c. 155–c. 220 ADApology 40.1–2

They think the Christians are the cause of every public disaster and every popular misfortune. If the Tiber rises to the walls, if the Nile does not rise over the fields, if the sky stands still, if the earth moves, if there is famine, if plague, at once the cry goes up: "Christians to the lion!" So many to one lion?

Neglect of the gods was thought to anger them and endanger the city.

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text
200c. AD
The charges

Caecilius (pagan speaker in Minucius Felix)Octavius 9

I hear that they venerate the consecrated head of a most vile beast [an ass], under some foolish persuasion — a religion worthy of such morals, and born from them! Others say they worship the genitals of their own chief priest and adore his nature as that of their parent: whether it is false I do not know, but it is certainly a suspicion that fits hidden, nocturnal rites. And whoever says that a man punished with the utmost penalty for a crime, and the deadly wood of the cross, form their ceremonies, assigns to depraved and criminal men altars that suit them, so that they worship what they deserve. ... An infant, covered with meal to deceive the unwary, is set before the one who is to be initiated into the rites. The infant is killed by the novice — lured by the surface of the meal as if to harmless blows — with blind and hidden wounds. His blood, oh abomination, they greedily lick up; his limbs they eagerly divide among themselves; by this victim they are bound together, and by this shared knowledge of the crime they pledge themselves to mutual silence.

These are not Minucius's own charges: they are the speech of Caecilius, the pagan interlocutor in the dialogue, retailing rumour (“I hear”, “others say”, “whether it is false I do not know”). Octavius answers the speech at length from chapter 16 onward. The passage shows what educated pagans believed Christians did in secret.

Read in context →
313c. AD
The name

Eusebius of Caesarea c. 260–c. 339 ADChurch History 8.2

The houses of prayer thrown down from their height to the ground, together with their very foundations, and the divine and holy Scriptures handed over to fire in the middle of the marketplaces, we saw with our own eyes. ... Imperial letters were spread everywhere, ordering that the churches be razed to the ground and the Scriptures destroyed by fire, and proclaiming that those who held honours should be degraded, and household slaves, if they persisted in their profession of Christianity, should be deprived of their freedom.

Eusebius was living in Palestine when Diocletian's first edict (303) opened the Great Persecution, and he writes as a contemporary eyewitness, not a later compiler. A second order soon followed in the same chapter: every church leader was to be imprisoned, then forced by every means to sacrifice.

Full English of this work is being translated
313c. AD
The name

Eusebius of Caesarea c. 260–c. 339 ADMartyrs of Palestine 1

Ordered to sacrifice to the so-called gods, he said that he knew only one, to whom it was fitting to sacrifice as he himself wills; and when he was also ordered to pour a libation to the four emperors, he uttered a word that was not pleasing to them and was beheaded at once, having spoken that poetic line: “The rule of many is not good; let there be one ruler, one king.”

The speaker is Procopius, a reader from Scythopolis, the first martyr in Palestine under the edict, executed at Caesarea in 303. Eusebius collected these Palestinian cases as a contemporary in the region; here refusal to sacrifice, with no other crime proved, is itself the capital offence.

Full English of this work is being translated

How this page was made

Every early quote was read in its Greek or Latin and translated for this page by Claude (Opus 5.5) on 13 October 2026. Each line names the printed edition it was read from. A quote marked indirect does not state the answer outright; read its note. A writer's silence is never counted as an answer.